Nonzero nonunit non-product-of-irreducibles is reducible?

  • Thread starter Thread starter julypraise
  • Start date Start date
julypraise
Messages
104
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Claim
Let R be an integral domain. Then a nonzero nonunit element in R that is not a product of irreducible elements is reducible.

Is this claim true?


Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution


By definition, a product of irreducibles is reducible because irreducibles are not units. This implies if nonzero nonunit x is irreducible then it is not a product of irreducible elements.

I've tried to prove the above claim by contradiction supposing nonzero nonunit x is both not a product of irreducibles and x is irreducible. But by the above observation, I couldn't; the fact that x is irreducible and the fact that x is nonzero nonunit and not a product of irreducibles are consistnet.

Logically, the claim asserts that if x is nonzero nonunit and not a product of irreducibles then x is reducible. Let's call this statement P -> Q. And the above observation yields, kinda, that ~P -> Q. But this this yields every nonzero nonunit element in R is reducible, which is absurd.

So the claim should be false?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The claim is false. The integers provide a good counter-example.
 
Thanks a lot!
 
There are two things I don't understand about this problem. First, when finding the nth root of a number, there should in theory be n solutions. However, the formula produces n+1 roots. Here is how. The first root is simply ##\left(r\right)^{\left(\frac{1}{n}\right)}##. Then you multiply this first root by n additional expressions given by the formula, as you go through k=0,1,...n-1. So you end up with n+1 roots, which cannot be correct. Let me illustrate what I mean. For this...
Back
Top