Norm Verification for Vectors in R^2

  • #31
Fredrik said:
What is the first step that you're not 100% sure about? Do you know the definition of x+y? If yes, then why not use it? Then use the definition of ##\|\ \|_{\#}##. After that you're almost done.

I don't know how to write the definition of x+y apart from what I gave originally..thanks for your patience.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #32
bugatti79 said:
4) ##\forall x,y \in \mathbb R^2## and ##x_1, y_1 \in \mathbb R##
we have ##x+y = x_1+2x_2 +y_1 +2y_2## ...?
So, x and y are elements of R2, meaning that you can write them as
x = <x1, x2>
y = <y1, y2>

Then what is x + y? It is NOT as you wrote above.

bugatti79 said:
I don't know how to write the definition of x+y apart from what I gave originally..thanks for your patience.
 
  • #33
bugatti79 said:
I don't know how to write the definition of x+y apart from what I gave originally..thanks for your patience.
I don't recall seeing a definition of x+y in this thread.

Edit: If you meant the equality ##x+y = x_1+2x_2 +y_1 +2y_2## (which is extremely incorrect, since the left-hand side is a member of a different set than the right-hand side), then no, this looks nothing at all like the definition of x+y. It looks like it was inspired by the definition of ##\|\ \|_{\#}##, but I see nothing in it that reminds me of the definition of x+y.

I'm going to bed early tonight, but I'm sure Mark44 or someone else can answer your next post.
 
Last edited:
  • #34
Fredrik said:
I don't recall seeing a definition of x+y in this thread.

Edit: If you meant the equality ##x+y = x_1+2x_2 +y_1 +2y_2## (which is extremely incorrect, since the left-hand side is a member of a different set than the right-hand side), then no, this looks nothing at all like the definition of x+y. It looks like it was inspired by the definition of ##\|\ \|_{\#}##, but I see nothing in it that reminds me of the definition of x+y.

I'm going to bed early tonight, but I'm sure Mark44 or someone else can answer your next post.

Yes, you are correct. Ok, thanks.

It is ##\|x+y\|_\#=...## that I should be focusing on...
 
  • #35
Yes, but before you focus on ##\|x+y\|_{\#}##, you should focus on x+y. Do you understand what the notation ##\mathbb R^2## means? What sort of objects are members of ##\mathbb R^2##. How do you add one of those objects to another? Do you at least understand that the notation x+y is completely meaningless until it has been defined? What is the standard definition of x+y for ##x,y\in\mathbb R^2##?
 
  • #36
To elaborate on what Fredrik said, how is addition usually defined for vectors in R2? That's basically what he's asking about for the expression x + y. This has nothing to do with norms.
 
  • #37
Mark44 said:
To elaborate on what Fredrik said, how is addition usually defined for vectors in R2? That's basically what he's asking about for the expression x + y. This has nothing to do with norms.

Fredrik said:
Yes, but before you focus on ##\|x+y\|_{\#}##, you should focus on x+y. Do you understand what the notation ##\mathbb R^2## means? What sort of objects are members of ##\mathbb R^2##. How do you add one of those objects to another? Do you at least understand that the notation x+y is completely meaningless until it has been defined? What is the standard definition of x+y for ##x,y\in\mathbb R^2##?

##\|x+y\| \le \|x_1+y_1\|+ \|2x_2 +2y_2\|##

##\le \|x_1+y_1\|+2\|x_2+y_2\|##

If the value of y is 0, isn't it still possible that the inequality holds? ie, the LHS can still be less than the RHS ie

##\|x\| \le \|x_1\|+ \|2x_2 \|##

So I am saying that axiom 4 holds. Is this how one examines it? Thanks
 
  • #38
bugatti79 said:
##\|x+y\| \le \|x_1+y_1\|+ \|2x_2 +2y_2\|##

##\le \|x_1+y_1\|+2\|x_2+y_2\|##

If the value of y is 0, isn't it still possible that the inequality holds? ie, the LHS can still be less than the RHS ie

##\|x\| \le \|x_1\|+ \|2x_2 \|##

So I am saying that axiom 4 holds. Is this how one examines it? Thanks

No. What you wrote makes no sense.

We asked you several times, how is x+y defined??

Let x=(x_1,y_1) and y=(y_1,y_2). Then how did we define

(x_1,x_2)+(y_1,y_2)

?
 
  • #39
bugatti79 said:
##\|x+y\| \le \|x_1+y_1\|+ \|2x_2 +2y_2\|##

##\le \|x_1+y_1\|+2\|x_2+y_2\|##
Try doing just one thing at a time. For all ##x,y\in\mathbb R^2##, we have
$$\|x+y\|_{\#}=...$$ The first step is to use the definition of + to rewrite x+y as an ordered pair of real numbers. The second step is to use the definition of ##\|\ \|_{\#}##. Then there's a third step. Don't try to do them all at once. Do them one at a time.

You also need to think about when to use the notation |something| and when to use the notation ##\|\text{something}\|_{\#}##. Also, in each step, use an equality sign if what you have on the left is the same thing as what you have on the right. Use ≤ only if you have reason to think that the thing on the right may be greater than the thing on the left.
 
  • #40
In addition, in this problem ||x + y|| is completely irrelevant. The norm you appear to be working with is ||x + y||#. Use the definition of this norm to first say what this expression equals, and then work on showing that the triangle inequality holds.
 
  • #41
Mark44 said:
In addition, in this problem ||x + y|| is completely irrelevant. The norm you appear to be working with is ||x + y||#. Use the definition of this norm to first say what this expression equals, and then work on showing that the triangle inequality holds.

Fredrik said:
Try doing just one thing at a time. For all ##x,y\in\mathbb R^2##, we have
$$\|x+y\|_{\#}=...$$ The first step is to use the definition of + to rewrite x+y as an ordered pair of real numbers. The second step is to use the definition of ##\|\ \|_{\#}##. Then there's a third step. Don't try to do them all at once. Do them one at a time.

You also need to think about when to use the notation |something| and when to use the notation ##\|\text{something}\|_{\#}##. Also, in each step, use an equality sign if what you have on the left is the same thing as what you have on the right. Use ≤ only if you have reason to think that the thing on the right may be greater than the thing on the left.

##x+y=(x_1+y_1,2x_2+2y_2)##?
 
  • #42
bugatti79 said:
##x+y=(x_1+y_1,2x_2+2y_2)##?

NO! Do you not understand how to add two vectors together? You should not be attempting to work problems about norms if you don't understand the basics of vector operations.
 
  • #43
bugatti79 said:
##x+y=(x_1+y_1,2x_2+2y_2)##?
No, this is wrong. Note that we're just doing addition here. Those functions that may or may not be norms have nothing to do with it.
 
  • #44
Bugatti, I think we could help you better if you would explain us your situation. What course are you taking now? What courses did you already take??
I'm asking this because I feel you miss some preliminary knowledge. We can help you rectify it by suggesting things you should look at.
 
  • #45
Mark44 said:
NO! Do you not understand how to add two vectors together? You should not be attempting to work problems about norms if you don't understand the basics of vector operations.

If v=(v1,v2) and w=(w1,w2) then v+w=(v1+w1,v2+w2)? Thats all I have done above?

Fredrik said:
No, this is wrong. Note that we're just doing addition here. Those functions that may or may not be norms have nothing to do with it.

micromass said:
Bugatti, I think we could help you better if you would explain us your situation. What course are you taking now? What courses did you already take??
I'm asking this because I feel you miss some preliminary knowledge. We can help you rectify it by suggesting things you should look at.

I am studying topics in analysis part time so I may be over tired from work. I have done PDE's and Calculus 1,2 last year.
 
  • #46
bugatti79 said:
If v=(v1,v2) and w=(w1,w2) then v+w=(v1+w1,v2+w2)? Thats all I have done above?
No, it isn't. You were mixing vector addition with the || ||# norm, producing a meaningless mush. Here is what I'm referring to.
bugatti79 said:
x+y=x1 +2x2 +y1 +2y2
 
  • #47
Mark44 said:
No, it isn't. You were mixing vector addition with the || ||# norm, producing a meaningless mush. Here is what I'm referring to.

So for x,y in R^2 where x=(x1,x2) and y=(y1,y2)

##x+ y= <x_1+ 2y_1, x_2+ 2y_2>##?
 
  • #48
bugatti79 said:
So for x,y in R^2 where x=(x1,x2) and y=(y1,y2)

##x+ y= <x_1+ 2y_1, x_2+ 2y_2>##?

No! You wrote it correctly in in your post 45. Why do you keep insisting on the 2?
 
  • #49
micromass said:
No! You wrote it correctly in in your post 45. Why do you keep insisting on the 2?

##x+y=(x_1+y_1, x_2+y_2)##

## \| x+y\|_{\#}= \| |x1|+|y1|, 2|x2|+2|y2| \|_{\#} ##...?
 
  • #50
bugatti79 said:
##x+y=(x_1+y_1, x_2+y_2)##

## \| x+y\|_{\#}= \| |x1|+|y1|, 2|x2|+2|y2| \|_{\#} ##...?
Here you're adding x and y correctly, but why don't you just insert the result you've found for x+y into ##\|x+y\|_{\#}##, and then use the definition of ##\|\ \|_{\#}##? What you wrote doesn't make any sense. The function ##\|\ \|_{\#}## takes a member of ##\mathbb R^2## as input. Here you used a real number as input. That doesn't make sense.

Edit: Why is there a comma in there? Did you mean ##\|(|x_1|+|y_1|,2|x_2|+2|y_2|)\|_{\#}##? That doesn't make much sense either. I mean, it it's not a nonsense expression, but I have no idea why you would consider an ordered pair with those components.
 
Last edited:
  • #51
bugatti79 said:
##x+y=(x_1+y_1, x_2+y_2)##

## \| x+y\|_{\#}= \| |x1|+|y1|, 2|x2|+2|y2| \|_{\#} ##...?

Did you use the definition?
bugatti79 said:
(i) || ||_#: R^2 defined by ||x||_#=|x_1|+2|x_2|

Doesn't look like it to me.
 
  • #52
Mark44 said:
Did you use the definition?


Doesn't look like it to me.

Fredrik said:
Here you're adding x and y correctly, but why don't you just insert the result you've found for x+y into ##\|x+y\|_{\#}##, and then use the definition of ##\|\ \|_{\#}##? What you wrote doesn't make any sense. The function ##\|\ \|_{\#}## takes a member of ##\mathbb R^2## as input. Here you used a real number as input. That doesn't make sense.

Edit: Why is there a comma in there? Did you mean ##\|(|x_1|+|y_1|,2|x_2|+2|y_2|)\|_{\#}##? That doesn't make much sense either. I mean, it it's not a nonsense expression, but I have no idea why you would consider an ordered pair with those components.

Now I am really confused. I know this is a big ask but is it not possible for one of you to write the answer and then I will query why you did it that way?. I have spent 3.5 hours on this trivial problem.
 
  • #53
Fredrik said:
The function ##\|\ \|_{\#}## takes a member of ##\mathbb R^2## as input. Here you used a real number as input. That doesn't make sense.

OK, should it be

##\| x+y\|_{\#}= \| \|x\|+\|y\| \|_{\#}##
 
  • #54
That's against forum rules.

Here's an example, though.
Suppose x = <3, 2> and y = <-1, 5>
||x + y||# = ||<2, 7>||# = |2| + 2|7| = 2 + 14 = 16

I can justify every step above. Can you provide a reason for each step?

See if you can use this as a template to calculate a more general result: ||x + y||#, with x = <x1, x2> and y = <y1, y2>
 
  • #55
bugatti79 said:
OK, should it be

##\| x+y\|_{\#}= \| \|x\|+\|y\| \|_{\#}##
Way off.
 
  • #56
Mark44 said:
That's against forum rules.

Here's an example, though.
Suppose x = <3, 2> and y = <-1, 5>
||x + y||# = ||<2, 7>||# = |2| + 2|7| = 2 + 14 = 16

I can justify every step above. Can you provide a reason for each step?

See if you can use this as a template to calculate a more general result: ||x + y||#, with x = <x1, x2> and y = <y1, y2>

x=(x1,x2), y=(y1,y2) both in R^2

line 1 ||x+y||_#=||(x1+y1),(x2+y2)||_# then using definition of the norm || ||_# we have
= |x1+y1|+2|x2+y2|
=|x1|+|y1|+2|x2| +2|y2|
=|x1|+2|x2|+|y1|+2|y2|
= ||x||_#+||y||_#

I am not sure how to justify going from line 2 to line 3...?

At what stage do I play with the inequalities?
 
  • #57
bugatti79 said:
x=(x1,x2), y=(y1,y2) both in R^2

line 1 ||x+y||_#=||(x1+y1),(x2+y2)||_# then using definition of the norm || ||_# we have
= |x1+y1|+2|x2+y2|
=|x1|+|y1|+2|x2| +2|y2|
=|x1|+2|x2|+|y1|+2|y2|
= ||x||_#+||y||_#

I am not sure how to justify going from line 2 to line 3...?

At what stage do I play with the inequalities?

Line 2 to 3 is wrong. You won't have an [STRIKE]inequality[/STRIKE] equality. But perhaps you can use

|a+b|\leq |a|+|b|

for a,b\in \mathbb{R}.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • #58
Mark44 said:
That's against forum rules.

Here's an example, though.
Suppose x = <3, 2> and y = <-1, 5>
||x + y||# = ||<2, 7>||# = |2| + 2|7| = 2 + 14 = 16

I can justify every step above. Can you provide a reason for each step?

See if you can use this as a template to calculate a more general result: ||x + y||#, with x = <x1, x2> and y = <y1, y2>

From ||x + y||# = ||<2, 7>||# because we have x+y=(x1+y1, x2+y2)

From ||<2, 7>||# = |2| + 2|7| because we have the definition of the norm ||x ||_# as |x1 |+ 2 | x2|
 
  • #59
bugatti79 said:
x=(x1,x2), y=(y1,y2) both in R^2

line 1 ||x+y||_#=||(x1+y1),(x2+y2)||_# then using definition of the norm || ||_# we have
= |x1+y1|+2|x2+y2|
=|x1|+|y1|+2|x2| +2|y2|
=|x1|+2|x2|+|y1|+2|y2|
= ||x||_#+||y||_#

I am not sure how to justify going from line 2 to line 3...?
As already noted by micromass, it's not justifiable.

Your first couple of steps were a good start, though, giving justifications for those steps. If you think about things from this perspective (giving a justification - definition, theorem, etc. - for each step) you will have made an important step toward thinking mathematically.
 
  • #60
bugatti79 said:
From ||x + y||# = ||<2, 7>||# because we have x+y=(x1+y1, x2+y2)

From ||<2, 7>||# = |2| + 2|7| because we have the definition of the norm ||x ||_# as |x1 |+ 2 | x2|
Yes, exactly right. This is precisely what we have been trying to get you to do.
 

Similar threads

Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K