Normal force in rotational motion

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around the behavior of the normal force acting on a disk hinged at its rim during rotational motion. When the disk is released from a horizontal position, it experiences angular acceleration and oscillates, affecting the normal force. Initially, the normal force is less than mg due to the downward acceleration of the center of mass, but it increases as the disk rotates and reaches a maximum at the lowest point of the swing, exceeding mg. The hinge force varies in a complex manner, balancing both the radial component of gravitational force and the required centripetal force during rotation. Ultimately, the relationship between the hinge force and the normal force is influenced by the disk's angle and motion.
cavis
Messages
8
Reaction score
0
Hi there,
I've got a conceptual question about the normal force as applied to rotational motion. Suppose you have an object like a uniform disk. If the disk were set up so that its axis of rotation were about its centre of mass, it would just sit there and the normal force would be equal to +mg.

What happens if the disk is instead hinged so that its axis of rotation is at its rim (see attached image)? Here if the disk is held horizontally and then released, it'll experience an angular acceleration and start to rotate. Ultimately were it frictionless, it would oscillate back and forth.

My question is what happens to the normal force in this situation? Does it remain equal to mg since ultimately the hinge isn't accelerating? Or, does the normal force decrease since the centre of mass of the disk is accelerating downwards. Or am I totally confused?

Thanks!

Chris.
 

Attachments

  • Rotational.png
    Rotational.png
    5.3 KB · Views: 692
Physics news on Phys.org
The normal force is the force due to axis rod which supports the disk? If so,
this will be initially lower than mg, since the disk accelerates downwards. Continually, as the disk rotates and falls down, the acceleration decreases and so the normal force increases. When the disk is at its lowest position, the normal force will be at its maximum value, which is greater than mg (due to rotation of the disk).
 
Jano L. said:
The normal force is the force due to axis rod which supports the disk? If so,
this will be initially lower than mg, since the disk accelerates downwards. Continually, as the disk rotates and falls down, the acceleration decreases and so the normal force increases. When the disk is at its lowest position, the normal force will be at its maximum value, which is greater than mg (due to rotation of the disk).

Thanks, Jano. This helps. Just to clarify, if the disk we just suspended at its lowest point without rotating, the hinge force would be equal to mg? But, since it's rotating and a radially directed centripetal force is required, the hinge force must exceed mg? Do I have that correct? If I interpret your response correctly, then, the force at the hinge will have a magnitude that varies in quite a complicated manner as the disk undergoes its rotational motion?

Thanks for your help, again.

Chris.
 
cavis said:
the force at the hinge will have a magnitude that varies in quite a complicated manner as the disk undergoes its rotational motion?
Not too complicated: just the force needed to balance the radial component of the gravitational force, + centripetal force. What will make it complicated for large perturbations is the 'circular error', i.e. the extent to which it is not SHM. For small perturbations, taking the SHM approximation, the hinge force will be something like A-Bθ2.
 
Just to clarify, if the disk we just suspended at its lowest point without rotating, the hinge force would be equal to mg? But, since it's rotating and a radially directed centripetal force is required, the hinge force must exceed mg? Do I have that correct?
That's right. Exact variation can be found as a function of the angle, but probably it won't be the simplest function possible.
 
The rope is tied into the person (the load of 200 pounds) and the rope goes up from the person to a fixed pulley and back down to his hands. He hauls the rope to suspend himself in the air. What is the mechanical advantage of the system? The person will indeed only have to lift half of his body weight (roughly 100 pounds) because he now lessened the load by that same amount. This APPEARS to be a 2:1 because he can hold himself with half the force, but my question is: is that mechanical...
Hello everyone, Consider the problem in which a car is told to travel at 30 km/h for L kilometers and then at 60 km/h for another L kilometers. Next, you are asked to determine the average speed. My question is: although we know that the average speed in this case is the harmonic mean of the two speeds, is it also possible to state that the average speed over this 2L-kilometer stretch can be obtained as a weighted average of the two speeds? Best regards, DaTario
Some physics textbook writer told me that Newton's first law applies only on bodies that feel no interactions at all. He said that if a body is on rest or moves in constant velocity, there is no external force acting on it. But I have heard another form of the law that says the net force acting on a body must be zero. This means there is interactions involved after all. So which one is correct?
Back
Top