Normalization and singularities

diegzumillo
Messages
177
Reaction score
20
Hi There!

Being direct to the point: Does normalization removes singularities? Such as infinite.

I came up with this question because, while I was working with a not normalized function, I reached a very strange result. There are two points where the probability tends to infininte.

Maybe that's because the function is not normalized. (intuitively, I thought the normalization would only re-scale the 'curve', when plotted) Or did I mess up the calculation?

If anyone wants to see more than that first question, I can show the equations I'm working. So we can have a more specific discussion. :)
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Diego Floor said:
Hi There! Being direct to the point: Does normalization removes singularities?
No.
Diego Floor said:
I came up with this question because, while I was working with a not normalized function, I reached a very strange result. There are two points where the probability tends to infininte.
That's possible if the probability distriubtion is integrable at these points. For example, consider a classical harmonic oscillator with x=a\cos(\omega t). If you look at it at a random time, the probability that you will find it between x and x+dx is P(x)dx, with

P(x)={1\over\pi}\,{1\over\sqrt{a^2-x^2}

for -a\le x\le a, and P(x)=0 otherwise. P(x) becomes infinite at x=\pm a, but still \int_{-a}^{+a}P(x)dx = 1.
 
Thanks! :D

I didn't remember that example, it really clarifies things out.

Ok, singularities are not evil! They just have a 'not so trivial' interpretation.
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA
If we release an electron around a positively charged sphere, the initial state of electron is a linear combination of Hydrogen-like states. According to quantum mechanics, evolution of time would not change this initial state because the potential is time independent. However, classically we expect the electron to collide with the sphere. So, it seems that the quantum and classics predict different behaviours!
According to recent podcast between Jacob Barandes and Sean Carroll, Barandes claims that putting a sensitive qubit near one of the slits of a double slit interference experiment is sufficient to break the interference pattern. Here are his words from the official transcript: Is that true? Caveats I see: The qubit is a quantum object, so if the particle was in a superposition of up and down, the qubit can be in a superposition too. Measuring the qubit in an orthogonal direction might...
Back
Top