Normalization of a wave function

AI Thread Summary
Normalization of a wave function involves integrating the square of the wave function's magnitude over all space to find the normalization constant. The integral presented, involving the exponential functions, can be complex, but simplifying the integration process is possible. It is suggested to first integrate over x and utilize delta functions to simplify the calculations. Understanding the physical significance of the wave function and its relation to momentum operators may also aid in grasping the normalization process. Mastering LaTex is recommended for clearer communication of mathematical expressions in discussions.
Feynmanfan
Messages
128
Reaction score
0
Normalization of a wavefunction

Let Phi be a wave function,

Phi(x)= Integral of {exp(ikx) dk} going k from k1 to k2

I'm having trouble normalizing the wave function. I calculated the integral, then multiply by its conjugate and now I'm supposed to integrate again /Phi(x)/^2 in all the space in order to find the normalization constant. I get a non trivial integral so I think it must be easier if I understand the physical meaning of the exercise. I know that exp(ikx) are the eigenfunctions of the mometum operator.

Is it the mathematics I'm doing wrong or is there another way. Thanks for your help.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
First, if you want answers in this forum, it is well worth your while to learn LaTex. If a guy who wears a hard hat can do LaTex, then so can you.

From your description of the problem, the "non trivial" integral you're getting is presumably:

|\phi|^2 = \int_{-\infty}^\infty \int_{k1}^{k2} \int_{k1}^{k2} e^{-ilx}e^{ikx}dk\; dl\; dx.

To solve this integral, do the integration over x first. If this seems impossible, look around for information on "delta functions". The delta function will allow you to do another one of the integrals pretty much trivially, and then the final integral will be easy.

Carl
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...

Similar threads

Back
Top