Normalization problem; volume element to use?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around the normalization of the wave function in quantum mechanics, specifically addressing the correct volume element in spherical coordinates. The initial confusion stems from the use of sine functions in the volume element, with one participant mistakenly using sin(φ) instead of the correct sin(θ). Clarification reveals that the variables θ and φ can be defined differently in mathematical versus physical contexts, leading to the observed discrepancies. Participants explore integration techniques to solve the normalization integral, ultimately correcting an earlier miscalculation. The conversation highlights the importance of consistent variable usage and integration methods in solving quantum mechanics problems.
adh2
Messages
5
Reaction score
0
Hello!

Homework Statement



I'm revising my quantum mechanics course, but I don't get this normalizing-problem. \psi = N r cos \theta e^{-r/a_0}

To begin with, this is how my teacher solves it in the solutions manual:

1=N^2\int_0^\infty r^2 e^{-r/a_0} r^2 dr \int_0^{\pi} \int_0^{2 \pi} cos^2\theta sin\theta d\theta d\phi
So:
N^2 = \int_0^\infty r^4 e^{-r/a_0} dr \cdot 2 \pi \cdot \frac{2}{3}<br /> = \frac{4 \pi}{3} 4! a_0^5<br />
Et cetera..

The Attempt at a Solution



When I tried to solve it I write the second part of the integral like this:
<br /> <br /> \int_0^{2 \pi}\int_0^{\pi} cos^2\theta sin\phi d\theta d\phi<br /> <br />
Here the problem is obvious. I say sin\phi, but my teacher says sin\theta. As I assume my teacher is the one who's correct, why isn't it sin\theta? I mean, the volume element when going from cartesian coordinates to spherical is dV= r^2 sin\phi drd\phi d\theta, right?

Not that it makes my answer any more like my teachers, but this is how i continue:
<br /> \int_0^{2 \pi} cos^2\theta d\theta \int_0^{\pi} sin\phi <br /> = \frac{1}{2} \left[\theta + sin\theta cos\theta\right]_0^{2 pi} \left[-cos\phi \right]_0^{\pi}<br /> = \left\{\frac{1}{2}\left(2 \pi + o\right) - \frac{1}{2}\left(0 + o\right)\right\} \left\{1-0\right\}<br /> = \pi ...<br />
Thank you for your time,
Alfrededit: forgot an N^2
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I mean, the volume element when going from cartesian coordinates to spherical is dV=r2sinϕdrdϕdθ, right?

Nope. It's r2sinθdrdϕdθ. See for example: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Spherical_coordinate_system under the section "Integration and differentiation in spherical coordinates"
 
Hello Alfred! :smile:
adh2 said:
… Here the problem is obvious. I say sin\phi, but my teacher says sin\theta. As I assume my teacher is the one who's correct, why isn't it sin\theta? I mean, the volume element when going from cartesian coordinates to spherical is dV= r^2 sin\phi drd\phi d\theta, right?

I think your teacher is using spherical coordinates with θ and φ the other way round from you.

(mathematicians do it one way, physicists do it the other)

The θ in cos2θ is measured from pole to pole isn't it? Well, the sin in the volume element has to be measured the same way. :wink:
 
It's the sine of whichever variable has integration limits from 0 to 2π.

I your teacher's solution it should be (and is) sin(θ) .

It is not used consistently in your expressions. (in your attempt ta a solution)
 
SammyS said:
It's the sine of whichever variable has integration limits from 0 to 2π.


no, 0 to π :wink:
 
Thank you, that makes more sense! I just assumed there was a standard. In my calculus textbook by R A Adams the integration element used is with sin phi. But indeed, a closer look in my physical chemistry book (Atkin's Physical Chemistry) and I see he uses sin theta! :D

I also thought the limits on the first integral sign always referred to the last d(variable), ( \int_{a_1}^{a_2}\int_{b_1}^{b_2} function \, db da) but apparently that's not the case here :P

However, I still can't solve it. \int_0^{2\pi} d\phi gives the 2\pi. But the rest doesn't work out to \frac{2}{3}:

\int_0^{\pi} cos^2 \theta sin \theta d \theta = \left\{ as \, \int_a^b U(x) dV(x) dx = \left[U(x)V(x)\right] - \int_a^b V(x)dU(x) dx \right\}

<br /> = \left[-cos^2\theta cos\theta\right]_0^{\pi} - \int_0^\pi \left(\frac{1}{2} \theta + \frac{1}{2} cos\theta sin\theta\right) \left(-cos\theta\right) d\theta

= 2 + \left( \frac{1}{2} \int_0^\pi \theta cos\theta d\theta + \frac{1}{4} \int_0^\pi sin 2\theta cos\theta d\theta \right)

<br /> = 2 + <br /> <br /> \frac{1}{2}\left( \left[ sin\theta \theta^2 1/2 \right]_0^\pi - \int_0^\pi 1 sin\theta d\theta \right) <br /> <br /> +\left( \frac{1}{4} \int_0^\pi sin 2\theta cos \theta d\theta<br /> \right)<br />
<br /> =2 + \frac{1}{2} \left( 0 - 2 \right) + \frac{1}{4} \left(\frac{4}{3}\right)<br /> <br /> =\frac{7}{3} \neq \frac{2}{3}<br />
In the last step I use:
<br /> \int_0^\pi sin mx \, cos nx \, dx = \stackrel{0 \,if\, m, n \, integers; m+m \, even}{\frac{2m}{ m^2+n^2} \,if\, m, n \, integers; m+n \, odd}<br />

Many steps; can you see which one is wrong? :S
 
Hello Alfred! :smile:

I don't understand where you got 1/2 θ from in your https://www.physicsforums.com/library.php?do=view_item&itemid=199" :confused:

it should have gone ∫ cos2θsinθ dθ = -cos2θcosθ - ∫ 2cos2θsinθ dθ …

but a u-subsitution would have been more sensible. :redface:
adh2 said:
I also thought the limits on the first integral sign always referred to the last d(variable), ( \int_{a_1}^{a_2}\int_{b_1}^{b_2} function \, db da) but apparently that's not the case here :P

You're right, it should do so.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Hi Tim! :)
That's from \int cos^2 \theta = \frac{1}{2} \left(\theta + sin \theta cos \theta\right)?

U-substitution. My calculus-skills are somewhat rusty, so that didn't seem like a possibility. But of course you're right!


\int_a^b f\left(g\left(x\right)\right)g&#039;\left(x\right) dx <br /> = \int_{g\left(a\right)}^{g\left(b\right)} f\left(t\right) dt, t=g\left(x\right) <br />

<br /> f\left(t\right) = t^2 , t = cos \theta; g&#039;\left(x\right) = -sin \theta<br />

<br /> \int_0^\pi cos^2 \theta sin \theta d \theta = - \int_{cos 0}^{cos \pi} u^2 du<br /> <br /> = \left[ \frac{1}{3} u^3 \right]_{1}^{-1}<br /> <br /> <br /> = -\left( \frac{-1}{3} - \frac{1}{3} \right) = \frac{2}{3}<br /> ! :D

Wow. Much simpler. I always get exactly this http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fXW02XmBGQw" (- the last few seconds..) when I solved a difficult math-problem.

Thank you very, very much Tim!
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Back
Top