Normalizing a wave function and calculating probability of position

Emspak
Messages
240
Reaction score
1
Forgive me if this goes in elementary physics, but I think since it's an upper level undergrad class

Homework Statement



A state of a particle bounded by infinite potential walls at x=0 and x=L is described by a wave function \psi = 1\phi_1 + 2\phi_2 where \phi_i are the stationary states.
a) Normalize the wave function.
b) What is the probability to find the particle between x=L/4 and x=3L/4?

Homework Equations



OK so was looking at how to approach this. One thought was to start with Schrödinger's equation

i \hbar \frac{\partial \psi}{\partial t} = - \frac{\hbar^2}{2m}\frac{\partial^2 \psi}{\partial x^2} + V(x)\psi(x,t)

The Attempt at a Solution



We have a situation where V(x) = 0 0 < x < L and V(x) = infinity outside of that. SO the V(x) term for inside the well disappears (it's zero).

And Energy, E = \frac{\hbar^2 k^2}{2m} where k is a constant, in this case 1.

That leaves us with a partial differential equation

i \hbar \frac{\partial \psi}{\partial t} = - \frac{\hbar^2}{2m}\frac{\partial^2 \psi}{\partial x^2}

which, moving it around a little,

i \hbar \frac{\partial \psi}{\partial t} - \frac{\hbar^2}{2m}\frac{\partial^2 \psi}{\partial x^2} = 0

and that's a 2nd order differential equation. The solutions are

\psi(x,t) = [A \sin(kx) + B \cos(kx)] e^{-i\omega t}

k is a wavenumber and for this to work -- for it to be zero when x is greater than L or less than 0, and some value anywhere else, the cosine term has to go, and since the wavenumber is limited to nπ/L (that's the only way you get an integral number of waves) So I should end up with

\psi(x,t) = [A \sin(k_nx)] e^{-i\omega_n t}But I am not entirely sure why the cos term has to go; I feel like I am missing a step. Either way, the probability of the particle being at any point from 0 to L is 1. So I need to integrate the wave function squared over that interval:

\int^L_0 |[A \sin(k_nx)] e^{-i\omega_n t}|^2 dx

but that's the thing, I feel like I have lost the plot with this.

ANother way to approach it was to assume that the wave function given can be

\psi = 1\phi_1 + 2\phi_2
\psi = (1\phi_1 + 2\phi_2)(1\phi_1^* + 2\phi_2^*)

and then multiply this out
\psi = (1\phi_1^* \phi_1 + 2\phi_1 \phi_2^* + 2\phi_1^* \phi_2 + 4\phi_2^*\phi_2)

SInce the phi functions are eigenvalues, the ones on the diagonal of the matrix are the only ones not zero. So we get
\psi = (1\phi_1^* \phi_1 + 4\phi_2^*\phi_2) = (1 + 4)

because the complex conjugate of a function multiplied by a function is 1.

Tht makes the whole thing add up to five. and since the probability of finding the particle on the interval 0 to x is

\int^L_0 |\psi|^2 dx = 1 \rightarrow \int^L_0 |5|^2 dx = 1 \rightarrow 25x = 1

so x = 1/25 for the whole interval, so normalizing the wave function I should get

\psi = \frac{1}{25}\phi_1 + \frac{2}{25}\phi_2

and for the probability that the particle is at L/4 and 3/4 L

(25/4)^2 and (75/4)^2

Now, if someone could tell me where I am getting lot and doing this completely wrong :-)

thanks in advance.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
In the original question you state that the wave function is "=11+22, where are the stationary states" are those boxes a mistake?
 
try it now...
 
Hi, I had an exam and I completely messed up a problem. Especially one part which was necessary for the rest of the problem. Basically, I have a wormhole metric: $$(ds)^2 = -(dt)^2 + (dr)^2 + (r^2 + b^2)( (d\theta)^2 + sin^2 \theta (d\phi)^2 )$$ Where ##b=1## with an orbit only in the equatorial plane. We also know from the question that the orbit must satisfy this relationship: $$\varepsilon = \frac{1}{2} (\frac{dr}{d\tau})^2 + V_{eff}(r)$$ Ultimately, I was tasked to find the initial...
The value of H equals ## 10^{3}## in natural units, According to : https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Natural_units, ## t \sim 10^{-21} sec = 10^{21} Hz ##, and since ## \text{GeV} \sim 10^{24} \text{Hz } ##, ## GeV \sim 10^{24} \times 10^{-21} = 10^3 ## in natural units. So is this conversion correct? Also in the above formula, can I convert H to that natural units , since it’s a constant, while keeping k in Hz ?
Back
Top