MHB How Does One Solve the Integral of Logarithmic Functions Over a Unit Interval?

  • Thread starter Thread starter alyafey22
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Integral Logarithm
AI Thread Summary
The integral of the logarithmic functions over a unit interval, specifically $$\int^1_0 \frac{\log(1+x)\log(1-x)}{x}\,dx$$, is discussed with a focus on the correct method for multiplying series. The error identified in evinda's solution pertains to using the pointwise product instead of the Cauchy product for absolutely convergent power series. This distinction is crucial for accurately solving the integral. The conversation highlights the importance of proper series multiplication techniques in calculus. Understanding these methods is essential for resolving similar logarithmic integrals effectively.
alyafey22
Gold Member
MHB
Messages
1,556
Reaction score
2
logarithm integral # (2)

Solve the following

$$\int^1_0 \frac{\log(1+x)\log(1-x)}{x}\,dx$$​
 
Last edited:
Mathematics news on Phys.org
ZaidAlyafey said:
Solve the following

$$\int^1_0 \frac{\log(1+x)\log(1-x)}{x}\,dx$$​

$$\log (1-x)=-\sum_{n=1}^{\infty} \frac{x^n}{n} \text{ for } |x|<1$$

$$\log (1+x)=\sum_{n=1}^{\infty} (-1)^{n+1} \frac{x^n}{n} \text{ for } |x|<1$$

So:

$$\frac{\log(1-x)\log(1+x)}{x}=\frac{- \sum_{n=1}^{\infty} \frac{x^n}{n} \cdot \sum_{n=1}^{\infty} \frac{(-1)^{n+1} x^n}{n}}{x}=\frac{\sum_{n=1}^{\infty} (-1)^{n+2} \frac{x^{2n}}{n^2}}{x}=\sum_{n=1}^{\infty} (-1)^n \frac{x^{2n-1}}{n^2}$$

Therefore:

$$\int_0^1 \frac{\log(1+x) \log(1-x)}{x} dx=\int_0^1 \sum_{n=1}^{\infty} (-1)^n \frac{x^{2n-1}}{n^2} dx=\sum_{n=1}^{\infty} \frac{(-1)^n}{n^2} \left [ \frac{x^{2n}}{2n}\right ]_0^1=\frac{1}{2} \sum_{n=1}^{\infty} \frac{(-1)^n}{n^3}$$
 
Last edited by a moderator:
evinda said:
$$\frac{\log(1-x)\log(1+x)}{x}=\frac{- \sum_{n=1}^{\infty} \frac{x^n}{n} \cdot \sum_{n=1}^{\infty} \frac{(-1)^{n+1} x^n}{n}}{x}=\frac{\sum_{n=1}^{\infty} (-1)^{n+2} \frac{x^{2n}}{n^2}}{x}=\sum_{n=1}^{\infty} (-1)^n \frac{x^{2n-1}}{n^2}$$

How did you perform the multiplication of the two series ?
 
In evinda's solution, there is an error made in multiplying the two series. The product of two absolutely convergent power series is given by the Cauchy product, not pointwise product.
 
Euge said:
In evinda's solution, there is an error made in multiplying the two series. The product of two absolutely convergent power series is given by the Cauchy product, not pointwise product.

I see..I am sorry! (Tmi)
 
$$\int^1_0 \frac{\log(1-x)\log(1+x)}{x}\,dx = -\zeta(2)\log(2)+\int^1_0 \frac{\mathrm{Li}_2(x)}{1+x}\,dx $$

$$\int^1_0 \frac{\mathrm{Li}_2(x)}{1+x}\,dx = \int^1_0 \sum_k (-x)^k \mathrm{Li}_2(x) = \sum_{k\geq 1} (-1)^{k-1}\int^1_0 x^{k-1} \mathrm{Li}_2(x) $$

Since

$$\int^1_0 x^{k-1}\mathrm{Li}_2(x)\, dx = \sum_{n\geq 1}\frac{1}{n^2(n+k)} =\frac{1}{k}\left(\zeta(2)-\frac{H_k}{k}\right)$$

We've got

$$\int^1_0 \frac{\mathrm{Li}_2(x)}{1+x}\,dx =\zeta(2)\sum_{k\geq 1} \frac{(-1)^{k-1}}{k}-\sum_{k\geq 1} (-1)^{k-1}\frac{H_k}{k^2} = \frac{1}{24}\left(4 \pi^2 \log(2)-15 \zeta(3)\right)$$

$$\int^1_0 \frac{\log(1-x)\log(1+x)}{x}\,dx = -\zeta(2)\log(2)+\zeta(2)\log(2)- \frac{15}{24} \zeta(3)=\frac{5}{8}\zeta(3)$$
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Suppose ,instead of the usual x,y coordinate system with an I basis vector along the x -axis and a corresponding j basis vector along the y-axis we instead have a different pair of basis vectors ,call them e and f along their respective axes. I have seen that this is an important subject in maths My question is what physical applications does such a model apply to? I am asking here because I have devoted quite a lot of time in the past to understanding convectors and the dual...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagoras'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...
Back
Top