Nuclear reactions and their applications

AI Thread Summary
Fission involves the splitting of a heavy nucleus into two smaller nuclei, while fusion combines lighter nuclei into a single heavier nucleus, both processes releasing significant energy. The key to understanding why these reactions are not contradictory lies in the binding energy per nucleon graph, which shows that nuclei with atomic numbers less than iron release energy when fused, while those with atomic numbers greater than iron release energy when split. The minimum binding energy occurs near iron, indicating that fission is favorable for heavy elements and fusion for lighter elements. This energy release is due to the stability gained as nuclei approach the binding energy minimum. Thus, both fission and fusion are energy-releasing processes, albeit occurring under different conditions based on the atomic mass of the nuclei involved.
rojasharma
Messages
64
Reaction score
0
Fission is a process in which a nucleus splits into two parts that are roughly the same size of the original nucleus. Tn fusion, two nuclei fuse, or combine, to form one nucleus. These reactions seem to be opposite to each other and yet both release large amounts of energy. Explain why this is not a contradiction. use the graph of binding energy per nuclean in your answer.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
No, in fission the nucleus split into nuclei which are roughly the same size as each other, not the same size as the original nucleus. The minimum of the binding energy is near the mass of iron. Suppose the fusing nuclei have masses much less than iron. Suppose the fissioning nucleus has a mass much greater than iron. Use the graph of binding energy per nucleon to explain this.
 
still don;t get it:(
 
If the atomic number is less than iron, you release energy by combining them. If the atomic number is greater than iron, you release energy by splitting them.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top