Nuclear Shell model, how do we know energy levels?

UniPhysics90
Messages
15
Reaction score
0
One of my 'course aims' is to be able to classify the shell model energy levels in terms of quantum numbers l and n and explain how magic numbers arise.

I'm using this to help to understand it as well as lecture notes. http://hyperphysics.phy-astr.gsu.edu/hbase/nuclear/shell.html

I know that l is the 'letter' in the energy states (s=0, p=1 etc) and n is the number (as in lowest s level is 1, second lowest 2 etc).

The energy levels are split into groups, but how are these groups actually decided? Is there some formula which predicts this? (I'm on about both the energy levels before and after spin orbit coupling)

Thanks
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Quantum mechanics, solving the atom.
 
It's basically the same process as in atomic physics. In atomic physics you have all electrons moving in a central potential caused by the nucleus. This causes the different quantum levels to appear.

In nuclear physics you can do the same. It is possible to use mean field theory on all the nucleons. This means that every nucleon moves in a potential caused by all the other nucleons. Averaging this for every nucleon gives a very different, but still central, potential problem. This can be solved assuming some shapes for the potential like Woods Saxon potential or square well. Again some quantum levels appear for the nucleons. That's why it is called the nuclear shell model.
 
Thanks guys, I guess I'll just learn the splitting of the first few levels so I can draw the diagram if required.
 
The first levels are easily calculated using simple potential models. The larger magic number are harder, because for more nucleons the potential gets adjusted and so do the magic numbers if you use a simple harmonic oscillator for example.
 
Toponium is a hadron which is the bound state of a valance top quark and a valance antitop quark. Oversimplified presentations often state that top quarks don't form hadrons, because they decay to bottom quarks extremely rapidly after they are created, leaving no time to form a hadron. And, the vast majority of the time, this is true. But, the lifetime of a top quark is only an average lifetime. Sometimes it decays faster and sometimes it decays slower. In the highly improbable case that...
I'm following this paper by Kitaev on SL(2,R) representations and I'm having a problem in the normalization of the continuous eigenfunctions (eqs. (67)-(70)), which satisfy \langle f_s | f_{s'} \rangle = \int_{0}^{1} \frac{2}{(1-u)^2} f_s(u)^* f_{s'}(u) \, du. \tag{67} The singular contribution of the integral arises at the endpoint u=1 of the integral, and in the limit u \to 1, the function f_s(u) takes on the form f_s(u) \approx a_s (1-u)^{1/2 + i s} + a_s^* (1-u)^{1/2 - i s}. \tag{70}...
Back
Top