Null geodesics of light from a black hole accretion disk

Favicon
Messages
14
Reaction score
0
Sorry I don't know latex so this may look a little messy.

Homework Statement



I'm trying to solve the equation for null geodesics of light traveling from a rotating black hole accretion disk to an observer at r = infinity. The point of emission for each photon is given by co-ordinates r, phi where r is radial distance from centre of the black hole, phi is azimuthal angle around the accretion disk (phi = 0 is defined to be the tangent point). The problem is stated as follows:

"Light travels on null geodesics given by the solution of the equation

d2u/dphi2 = 3u2 - u

where u = 1/r. The full paths can be found by integrating this from u=1/rem, phiem to u = 0 (r=infinity), phi = 0. This requires varying the initial gradient (du/dphi)em = - uemtanE until the correct solution is found for an angle E = E' + theta, where E' is the 'straight line' angle, and theta is the additional deflection from lightbending as the photon travels from rem to infinity. Explore the size of theta to estimate where the straight line approximation may break down."

I've also been told that to solve the equation I need to split it into two 1st order ODEs, but I'm not sure how to do that.

Homework Equations

The Attempt at a Solution



I'm really struggling just to try and understand the description, let alone solve the equation. Please could someone explain to me what this means and how I can extract the light paths from the given equations?
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Favicon said:
Sorry I don't know latex so this may look a little messy.

I learned latex when I joined Physics Forums. See

https://www.physicsforums.com/showthread.php?t=8997.
Favicon said:
I'm trying to solve the equation for null geodesics of light traveling from a rotating black hole
Favicon said:
"Light travels on null geodesics given by the solution of the equation

d2u/dphi2 = 3u2 - u

where u = 1/r.

But this equation is for null geodesics of non-rotating black holes. Is this what you want to do?
Favicon said:
I've also been told that to solve the equation I need to split it into two 1st order ODEs, but I'm not sure how to do that.

This second-order equation can be reduced to a pair of first-order equations by setting p = du/d\phi, so that dp/d\phi = d^2 u/d\phi^2. Consequently,
the second-order equation is eqiuvalent to

<br /> \begin{equation*}<br /> \begin{split}<br /> \frac{du}{d\phi} &amp;= p \\<br /> \frac{dp}{d \phi} &amp;= 3u^2 - u.\\<br /> \end{split}<br /> \end{equation*}<br />
 
Thanks for the latex tip.

But this equation is for null geodesics of non-rotating black holes. Is this what you want to do?
Yes it probably is a non-rotating black hole. I'm actually writing a program to produce the expected line spectrum from a black hole, but the description I've been given (to explain the physics of relativistic line smearing) isn't very clear so when it talked about the motion of the accretion disk I assumed it meant the black hole itself was rotating.

\frac{du}{d\phi} = p
\frac{dp}{d\phi} = 3u^{2} - u

So now I have
\frac{du}{d\phi} = p_{em} = -u_{em}tan(E)
and have to vary E? But I still can't see how I'll know when I've found the correct value for E.
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top