Number of decayed atoms in a simultaneous decay process

AI Thread Summary
To calculate the number of decayed atoms from a specific process in a simultaneous decay scenario, one must first recognize that the total decay equation combines both processes. The total number of remaining atoms is given by N(t) = N_0 e^{-(\lambda_1 + \lambda_2) t}. To isolate the contribution from radioactive decay alone, use the derivative N'_rad(t) = -λ1 * N(t), which represents the decay rate due to radioactive decay. Similarly, for the biological elimination process, the rate is given by N'_elim(t) = -λ2 * N(t). By solving these equations, one can determine the number of atoms decayed by each process at time t.
mike_M
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
A certain amount N_0 of a radioactive isotope with decay constant \lambda_1 is injected into a pacient. Besides that isotope's natural decay process, there's also a biological elimination process, with decay constant \lambda_2.

Now, at time t, the number of remaining isotope atoms is given by N(t) = N_0 e^{-(\lambda_1 + \lambda_2) t}. My question is, how do I calculate the number of atoms that, at time t, have decayed by *one* specific process (e.g. by radioactive decay alone)? I don't think I can use the above equation, with \lambda_1 instead of the sum, because such an equation would describe the number atoms assuming that that only one decay process is occurring (the one characterized by the used value of \lambda.

How to proceed then?
Thanks in advance for your help.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Try working with your equation such that you can separate the contribution of each process.

Remember that you can freely separately the exponentials.
 
Your equation comes from solving N'=-lamba1*N-lambda2*N. Once you've found the total number of atoms as a function of time N(t) (as you've done) then the number of atoms going by one process or another is given by N'_rad(t)=-lambda1*N(t) and N'_elim(t)=-lambda2*N(t). Solve those.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...

Similar threads

Back
Top