Numerical integration methods applicable to a type of definite integral

Tachyonomad
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
Numerical integration methods applicable to a type of definite integrl

Hey, so I've been working on a program to numerically integrate an integral of the form

∫xnf(x) dx, LIM(0 to INF.)

Here n can go to negative non integral values, say -3.7 etc. and f(x)
is a function of sin, cos and x's.
I want to know which numerical integration method I should be using for this
type of definite integral. I was looking at Gauss-Laguerre quadrature method, but I don't
know it it will be applicable, given the constraint on n to be > -1

(http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gauss–Laguerre_quadrature#Generalized_Gauss.E2.80.93Laguerre_quadrature)

Also, there is a singularity at x=0, which will affect it.
Can anyone given any tips on how to handle this ?
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Note that if the integral doesn't converge then no numerical algorithm will help you. If n=-3.7, then near zero your f needs to look like f(x)\approx x^a for a>2.7 for the integral to exist. That is why generalized Gauss-Laguerre has the n>-1 condition. Conditions as x\rightarrow \infty must also be met of course. The exponential in Gauss-Laguerre also helps with this.

jason
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
I'm interested to know whether the equation $$1 = 2 - \frac{1}{2 - \frac{1}{2 - \cdots}}$$ is true or not. It can be shown easily that if the continued fraction converges, it cannot converge to anything else than 1. It seems that if the continued fraction converges, the convergence is very slow. The apparent slowness of the convergence makes it difficult to estimate the presence of true convergence numerically. At the moment I don't know whether this converges or not.
Back
Top