Numerical solution of a differential equation with time dependent terms

Carlos Criollo
Messages
9
Reaction score
0
I am would like to solve this differential equation:

1.png


Where

upload_2014-10-10_14-43-52.png

upload_2014-10-10_14-44-16.png

http://ieeexplore.ieee.org.ezproxy.uniandes.edu.co:8080/ielx5/8/6493417/6409989/html/img/6409989-eqdisp-3-small.png
upload_2014-10-10_14-55-52.png


Could you give me some practical ideas about the required software and methodology? Thank you very much
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
If all the parameters are known, did you try to just calculate it time steps by time step? Did it work?
There are more precise integration methods, but that is something you can have a look at afterwards.
 
Yes, all the parameters are known, but how I can calculate the time step by time step?
 
Carlos Criollo said:
Yes, all the parameters are known, but how I can calculate the time step by time step?
Time is the independent variable. You start your calculations at t = 0, increment t, rinse and repeat.
 
And how I could implement it in software?, I need a numerical solution of this equations.
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
I'm interested to know whether the equation $$1 = 2 - \frac{1}{2 - \frac{1}{2 - \cdots}}$$ is true or not. It can be shown easily that if the continued fraction converges, it cannot converge to anything else than 1. It seems that if the continued fraction converges, the convergence is very slow. The apparent slowness of the convergence makes it difficult to estimate the presence of true convergence numerically. At the moment I don't know whether this converges or not.
Back
Top