Nyquist - shannon sampling theorem example

Jncik
Messages
95
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


What sampling frequency would you use to sample the following signal

x(t) = 3sin(9πt) - 6cos(8πt)

Homework Equations

The Attempt at a Solution



let T1 be the period of 3sin(9πt) and T2 the period of 6cos(8πt)

T1 = 2π/9π = 2/9
Τ2 = 2π/8π = 2/8

thus, if f1 is the frequency of 3sin(9πt) and f2 the frequency of 6cos(8πt) we have

f1 = 1/T1 = 9/2 = 4.5
f2 = 1/T2 = 8/2 = 4

now about the niquist rate,

I'm not sure whether it will be 9(2*f1, since f1>f2) or the frequency that is 2 times larger than the overall frequency of x(t)

can you please remind this to me? thanks
 
Physics news on Phys.org


I'm not sure whether it will be 9(2*f1, since f1>f2) or the frequency that is 2 times larger than the overall frequency of x(t)
Not sure what you mean by the "overall frequency of x(t)".

When you sample at the Nyquist frequency, you need to sample at twice the highest frequency component of the signal.
 


thanks lewando

What I was meaning is that

x(t) may have two components but the overall frequency is the least common multiple of the frequencies of each of these 2 components right? so the result will be different

thus if I understand correctly the result should be 2*f1 = 9 because f1 > f2 right?
 


...the overall frequency is the least common multiple of the frequencies of each of these 2 components right?
Honestly, I have never seen the term "overall frequency", as you have defined, used anywhere.

thus if I understand correctly the result should be 2*f1 = 9 because f1 > f2 right?
Right! :smile:
 


thanks a lot ;)
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top