StevieTNZ said:
Yeah! I was checking geonet.org.nz and I saw all these earthquakes after the 12.02am happening around the country... one even by Levin!
GeoNet says the massive 7.5 earthquake overnight seemed so long was because it was two quakes, not one - lasting a combined two minutes and triggering a swarm of frightening aftershocks.
.
As I noted in an earlier comment
this is a possibility, but it isn't the only cause of long duration shaking.
Once the chaos has died down a bit in the Seismo Obs at GNS, I would really like to query them on that statement and hopefully get a response as to why they think that?. I really think it may have been made in haste, considering at the time, they estimated a magnitude much smaller than what it really was. This meant the smaller size couldn't account for the shaking time that a larger event would have and they had to come up with a reason.
The other common cause is by the rupture mode. The 2 main ones are uni-lateral and bi-lateral. The significant difference is that a uni-lateral rupture will produce twice the shaking period as a bi-lateral rupture
Uni-lateral --- Rupture on the fault starts at one end of the rupture zone and propagates primarily in a single direction
Bi-lateral ----- Rupture on the fault starts roughly in the middle of the rupture zone and propagates roughly equally in both directions
Lets initially ignore the cluster of events up of the Cape Campbell area as they are associated with different fault(s). We will look at the main shock, SE of Hanmer Springs and the following aftershocks that trend to the NE through the Kaikoura region and then offshore. In the case of this event, neither the seismograms, nor the aftershock sequence suggest a multiple event. Rather they both suggest a single event and most likely a uni-lateral rupture.
It can be seen from the aftershock distribution that there are very few events to the SW of the main event. The vast majority of them are to the NE, up to and off the coast beyond Kaikoura.
The rupture has most likely to have occurred on the Hope Fault that I have high-lighted in yellow. Don't be too put off by the designated locations of the events relative to the fault, there is going to be a reasonable error in their location and also, since they were a little deeper (~ 25 - 35km), some of them ( including the main event) could well have been down dip on the fault plane to the south east.
At this time, I am pretty confident that the Hope Fault will be the nominated source of the event. It's the only obvious major fault in the area. I would suggest that, tho it is possible that the event occurred on some hidden fault line, it would be highly unlikely.
Considering the size of the event, it is...
1) likely that wouldn't have been the first event throughout history
2) would require the presence of a major fault that is unlikely to have remained hidden for millions of years.more to come ...