Object A is stationary while objects B and C are in motion.

AI Thread Summary
In the discussion, participants analyze the work and energy changes involving three objects, A, B, and C, where A is stationary while B and C are in motion. The key points include the calculation of work done on each object, with object A having zero work due to its stationary state, leading to a change in kinetic energy (ΔKtot) of 17 J when considering A, B, and C as a single system. The confusion arises regarding the potential energy change (ΔU), which is calculated as -5 J when only the interactions between A, B, and C are considered, excluding external forces. The conversation emphasizes the importance of understanding how work is defined and the implications of external forces on the system's energy. Ultimately, the resolution clarifies the energy conservation principles in non-isolated systems.
Cc518
Messages
23
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Object A is stationary while objects B and C are in motion.
Forces from object A do 10 J of work on object B and –5 J of
work on object C. Forces from the environment do 4 J of work
on object B and 8 J of work on object C. Objects B and C do
not interact. What are ΔKtot and ΔU if (a) objects A, B, and C
are defined as separate systems and (b) one system is defined to
include
objects A, B, and C and their interactions?

Homework Equations


ΔEsys 2 = ΔKtot + ΔU = (WA + WB+WC) + ΔU = 0

The Attempt at a Solution


I get WB=14J and WC=3J. I just don't understand why WA is not -5J. Apparently C and B exert forces onto A, right? So ΔKtot = 14 + 13 -5 =12J, but the answer is 17J.
For part B, I thought ΔU = -ΔKtot= -12J, but the answer is -5J.

Any help is appreciated!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Cc518 said:
why WA is not -5J
By some unspecified means, A remains stationary. How is the work done on an object defined?
 
haruspex said:
By some unspecified means, A remains stationary. How is the work done on an object defined?
No work acting on A because no net force exerted on A?
 
Cc518 said:
No work acting on A because no net force exerted on A?
That's not what I asked. How is the work done on a body defined?
 
haruspex said:
That's not what I asked. How is the work done on a body defined?
The body has to move a distance d
 
Cc518 said:
The body has to move a distance d
Ok, maybe it is not the definition as such, but this is what I mean:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Work_(physics)#Work–energy_principle
"the work done by all forces acting on a particle (the work of the resultant force) equals the change in the kinetic energy of the particle".

So how much work is done on A?
 
A is stationary which means its velocity doesn't change, therefore its change in kinetic energy is zero, therefore the work done on A is zero
 
Cc518 said:
A is stationary which means its velocity doesn't change, therefore its change in kinetic energy is zero, therefore the work done on A is zero
Right.
Does that also answer your query on part b?
 
So if we consider A, B and C as one system, the ΔKtot is 14 + 13 =17J. Then the change in potential energy should be -17J since the energy is conserved in an isolated system, am I correct?
But the answer says change in potential energy is 5J, I don't understand:sorry:
 
  • #10
Cc518 said:
the energy is conserved in an isolated system
But it is not isolated. If it were, A would move, and we are anyway told that external forces do work on B and C.
 
  • #11
Sorry, I still don't understand how WA=0(work done on A equals zero) helps me to understand part b...
If we only consider the interactions between A,B and C, excluding the external forces, the total change in kinetic energy is WB+WC=10-5=5J, which makes the total change in potential energy equal to - ΔKtot=-5J in a system consisting A, B and C. Am I right?
 
  • #12
Cc518 said:
If we only consider the interactions between A,B and C, excluding the external forces, the total change in kinetic energy is WB+WC=10-5=5J, which makes the total change in potential energy equal to - ΔKtot=-5J in a system consisting A, B and C. Am I right?
Yes, I think so.
 
  • #13
OK,thank you so much!
 
Back
Top