Oblique Asymptotes: What happens to the Remainder?

  • Thread starter Thread starter LaMantequilla
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Remainder
LaMantequilla
Messages
8
Reaction score
0
Let's say I'm trying to find the oblique asymptote of the function:

f(x)=
-3x2 + 2
x-1

Forgive my poor formatting.

So because the denominator isn't linear, we do polynomial long division of the function and ultimately get -3x - 3 as our quotient, with a remainder of -1. For the sake of the oblique asymptote, we disregard the remainder. But why? I haven't found a website that explains it; they all simply say to ignore the remainder. It bothers me that we just forget about it, regardless of what it is.
Can you explain to me why we disregard the remainder, and where it "goes?"
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
An "asymptote" is a line that a curve approaches as x goes to, in this case, negative infinity and infinity. Yes, long division gives a quotient of -3x- 3 with a remaider of -1. That means that
\frac{-3x^2+ 2}{x- 1}= -3x- 3- \frac{1}{x- 1}
As x goes to either infinity or negative infinity, that last fraction goes to 0.
 
That makes perfect sense! Thank you so much!
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
I'm interested to know whether the equation $$1 = 2 - \frac{1}{2 - \frac{1}{2 - \cdots}}$$ is true or not. It can be shown easily that if the continued fraction converges, it cannot converge to anything else than 1. It seems that if the continued fraction converges, the convergence is very slow. The apparent slowness of the convergence makes it difficult to estimate the presence of true convergence numerically. At the moment I don't know whether this converges or not.
Back
Top