Observing M87's spectral of light

  • Thread starter Thread starter bobo1455
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Light
AI Thread Summary
M87, a massive galaxy located 54 million light-years from Earth, contains a black hole at its center. Observations of its light spectrum reveal the red spectral line of hydrogen, which is typically around 656.3 nm. One participant initially selected 656 nm based on textbook information but later adjusted their answer to 659 nm after considering redshift effects. The redshift calculation involved using the Doppler shift formula, incorporating the radial velocity of M87. This discussion highlights the importance of both the spectral data and redshift in determining observed wavelengths.
bobo1455
Messages
33
Reaction score
0
The galaxy M87, shown in Figure 15.5, was discovered by Charles Messier in 1781. Located
54 million light-years from Earth, it is one of the most massive galaxies in the Universe,
including a black hole at its centre that is 4 billion times more massive than the Sun. Observing
the spectrum of M87’s light, we detect the spectral pattern of hydrogen. Use this information
to determine the wavelength at which we observe the red spectral line of hydrogen. Show how
you got your answer.

(A) 650 nm
(B) 654 nm
(C) 656 nm
(D) 659 nm
(E) 662 nm

I got 656 nm. My reasoning for picking (C) is that I looked up the wavelength spectrum for Hydrogen in my textbook and for red spectral line in Hydrogen is approximately 656.3 nm, so I assume it is 656 nm for the final answer.

I don't think it has anything to do with redshift and blueshift so I believe my answer is correct, but please correct me if I am missing something.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Now, from the data given, strictly speaking, the hydrogen-red line is at 656.2/656.3, so 656 nm is correct.

However, if we take redshift into account, it's 659 nm.

Now, the question says, "to determine the wavelength at which we observe the red spectral line of hydrogen". There's that word there "observe", which creates complications.
 
How did you get 659 nm? Are you using some form of the Doppler shift formula? I'll try using a re-arranged version of the Doppler Shift formula to solve for one of the wavelengths and maybe that will make more sense to me.
 
I got it. I re-arranged the doppler shift formula to solve for λshift.

The known variables I need for the formula were λrest, speed of light (c) and the radial velocity of the object.

I got the radial velocity for M87 in my textbook under the Appendix. Then I just plugged in the values and got 659 nm as my final answer.

Thanks for the help!
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top