Obtain the resistance of a ntc thermistor

AI Thread Summary
To determine the resistance of an NTC thermistor at a specific temperature, the characteristic temperature (B) and the resistance at a known temperature (A) are crucial. The equation R = A * e^(B/T) can be used, where T is the temperature in Kelvin. The user is trying to find the resistance at 100 degrees Celsius, given that the resistance is 47 ohms at 20 degrees Celsius and the characteristic temperature is 3900K. There is confusion regarding the relationship between resistance and temperature, with assumptions made about linearity and the resistance approaching zero at the characteristic temperature. More information or clarification on the thermistor's behavior may be necessary for accurate calculations.
Sparky2020
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
Please Help!

HI.
Im really struggling to work out how to obtain the resistance of a ntc thermistor from just having the temperature. I've been given the characteristic temp. of 3900K, labelled B for some reason. the only equation i can find to use is R = A.e to the power of B/T. I think this is somwthing to do with the base of natural logarithms, but when i asked my lecturer, he said no knowledge of logs was needed.
Please help!

Thank you loads in advance..
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Is there any more information?
 
The question asks that if the ntc thermistor has a resistance of 47 ohms at 20 degrees celsius, and its characteristic temp is 3900K then what is its resistance at 100 degrees celsius?
I can't even find a suitable equation which relates its resistance to its temperature.
 
I am going to guess here because I don't actually know. I'm guessing the resistance is 0 at the characteristic temperature. Perhaps you know about that. I will also assume a linear relationship. If it isn't linear, you need more information anyhow.

Assuming this, it's a ratio. Actually, I'll let you work it out rather. Try with these assumptions.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top