Obtaining Coefficients and Uncertainties for a Least-Squares Parabola

  • Thread starter Thread starter diegojco
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Parabola
AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on the challenge of obtaining coefficients and uncertainties for a least-squares parabola, similar to those derived for a linear least-squares regression. The user expresses frustration with the complexity of deriving these expressions and the lack of uncertainty calculations available in Matlab. They successfully outline the formulas for linear regression coefficients and their uncertainties but struggle to adapt these methods for a parabolic fit. The conversation suggests that logarithmic transformations may be necessary to simplify the parabolic data into a linear form for analysis. Ultimately, the user seeks guidance on calculating uncertainties for their parabolic least-squares fitting, which is crucial for their lab report on Maxwell's Disc.
diegojco
Messages
23
Reaction score
0
I have tried to find some information of the expresions for a least-squares parabola coefficients (including their uncertaintities), then I have tried to do it for myself using the minimum condition for partial derivatives as same as with the least-squares line, but the expressions of coefs are so complex, and then I have no idea to obtain uncertaintities. In Matlab are a function to get the coefficients but not the uncertaintities, and I am upset, since I must get how to obtain uncertaintities, it's fundamental for a lab report on Maxwell's Disc.

Please Help Me!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
For the linear least-squares regression we can get:

y=ax+b

a=(Σxy-nxmeanymean)/(Σ(x^2)-n(xmean^2))

b=ymean-axmean

and their uncertaintities:

Δa=sqrt((Σ((y-(ax)-b)^2))/(n-2))/sqrt(Σ(x^2)-n(xmean^2))

Δb=sqrt((Σ((y-(ax)-b)^2))/(n-2))*sqrt((1/n)+((xmean^2)/D))

where D=(Σ(x^2)-n(xmean^2)). hence we have that the ecuation is:

y=(a±Δa)x+(b±Δb)

Well I'm triying to do the same for a parabolic least-squares.
 
for a parabolic least squares, you need to use logarithms.
/s
 
plot you graph on log paper. it should make a stright line.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top