Obtaining mathematical model for the kinetic system

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around deriving the mathematical model for a kinetic system involving multiple masses and springs, with input force f(t) and kinetic friction constants b1 and b2. The user is uncertain whether to include friction forces between certain masses in their equations and questions the dependency of x1 and x2 on the input force f(t). They have attempted to modify their equations to account for these factors but remain confused about the correct formulation, particularly regarding the effects of springs and friction on the system's dynamics. Clarification is sought on how to properly express the equations for x3 and the overall system. The conversation highlights the complexities of modeling interactions in a multi-body kinetic system.
ssulun
Messages
6
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



See attachment.

f(t) is the input force and b1 and b2 are kinetic friction constants. There is no static friction.

Homework Equations



ƩF = m \ddot{x}
F_s=kx
F_f=b\dot{x}

Ff is the force from friction and Fs is the force from spring.

The Attempt at a Solution



m_1\ddot{x_1}=-b_1\dot{x_1}-k_1x_1-k_1x_2
m_2\ddot{x_2}=-b_2\dot{x_2}-k_1x_1-k_1x_2-k_2x_2
m_3\ddot{x_3}=f

I have two questions:

1) Should I include the friction between m1 and m3 and m2 and m3 in the equation for x3 and why?

2) When I imagine this system, I think that f(t) should definitely affect x1 and x2, but in my equations it doesn't. Where am I doing wrong?

Thanks in advance.
 

Attachments

  • system.jpg
    system.jpg
    58.5 KB · Views: 476
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Let me try, hope somebody will correct me.
Taking springs as massless.

m1a=k1x1+b1m1g
m2a=k2x2+b2m2g-k1x1
(m1+m2+m3)a=f(t)
 
b1 and b2 are kinetic friction constants, and k1 spring is squeezed from both x1 and x2 so I can change those parts, but your work gave me new ideas, thank you.
 
I have modified it as:

m_1\ddot{x_1}=-b_1\dot{x_1}-k_1x_1-k_1x_2
m_2\ddot{x_2}=-b_2\dot{x_2}-k_1x_1-k_1x_2-k_2x_2
(m_1+m_2+m_3)\ddot{x_3}=f

But still, x1 and x2 don't depend on f and that bothers me.
 
I should have written the effect of k1 in the equation 1 as k1(x1+x2), not k1x1.

Also, the k2 spring will pull m3 with k2x2 (to balance the forces on the k2 spring). So should I write the equation for x3 as:
m_3\ddot{x_3}=f-k_2x_2
or should I write an overall system with (m1+m2+m3) and include the unbalanced forces from b1 and b2?

I am very confused.
 
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Back
Top