ODE question, appreciate your help

  • Thread starter Thread starter zibb3r
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Ode
zibb3r
Messages
6
Reaction score
0
Untitled.png


Can anyone give me a hand with this question? I honestly have no idea how to do it?

I was thinking for d(A)/dt=-d(B)/dt= -k1(A)+k-1(B) because the 2 on both sides cancels out? But this was completely wrong...

Any ideas? :)
 
Physics news on Phys.org
zibb3r said:
View attachment 62034

Can anyone give me a hand with this question? I honestly have no idea how to do it?

I was thinking for d(A)/dt=-d(B)/dt= -k1(A)+k-1(B) because the 2 on both sides cancels out? But this was completely wrong...

Any ideas? :)

The equation of the most elementary reversible chemical reaction. Your equation is OK. Just use conservation of mass which enables you to get the equation in one dependent variable only.

I don't see the point of the 2 either*. I suggest you reframe it as A ⇔ B with the rate constants half those given.

Since this seems meant to trip students up, I suggest you placate them by using the symbols they ask, a and b.


* Unless by any chance the context suggests they mean a mechanism in which two molecules of A collide and transform into something that rapidly dissociates into two molecules of B, in which case the d.e. would be different. However if you have never done the more elementary one before then are unlikely to mean this.
 
Last edited:
Thanks but apprantley I have to show it fully as in can't can have it that way/have to show the 2s. Do you have any clue how Id write it that way?
 
zibb3r said:
Thanks but apprantley I have to show it fully as in can't can have it that way/have to show the 2s. Do you have any clue how Id write it that way?

I can't offer more than
zibb3r said:
I don't see the point of the 2 either*. I suggest you reframe it as A ⇔ B with the rate constants half those given.
.
plus my *footnote in post.

Sometimes here we have to spend too much time on exegesis, working out what a question could possibly mean. This looks like a printed text, if we saw more of where it came from, e.g. the textbook section, or the section on which it is an exercise, we'd know better what the problem is.
 
There are two things I don't understand about this problem. First, when finding the nth root of a number, there should in theory be n solutions. However, the formula produces n+1 roots. Here is how. The first root is simply ##\left(r\right)^{\left(\frac{1}{n}\right)}##. Then you multiply this first root by n additional expressions given by the formula, as you go through k=0,1,...n-1. So you end up with n+1 roots, which cannot be correct. Let me illustrate what I mean. For this...

Similar threads

Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
1K
Replies
5
Views
1K
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Back
Top