Ohmic Resistor modelling ?(Check my interpretation of question)

sid9221
Messages
110
Reaction score
0
http://dl.dropbox.com/u/33103477/Resistor.png

For the first bit first I solved the equation

\frac{dI}{dt}=\frac{U-RI}{L}

I(t)=\frac{U-C_2e^{\frac{-t}{L}}}{R}

Now I put in T(0)=0 to work out the constant and I got

I(t)=\frac{U-Ue^{\frac{-t}{L}}}{R}

Now here's the dodgy bit, I did not do physics in my final years at school so I no clue what an "Ohmic Resistor" is but here is my interpretation of the question

I(t)=\frac{75U}{100R}

Working that out I got

t = -L log(0.25)

Now for the final part:

My interpretation was that the maximum saturation level was U/R=200/50=4

So I worked out:

I(t)= 3.5

Which gave me t=90.31

Does what I have done make sense cause I don't know much "higher level" physics so am just working from logic.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
an ohmic resistor satisfies U=IR, so what you've done seems reasonable, though I haven't checked your numbers

one thing though, its always good practice to differentiate you solution, in this case I(t), and make sure it satisfies the original DE. I would recommend that check as usually the time constant in the exponential would depend on both R and L

Also you really need to know if they are in series or parallel, though it's implied by the DE..
 
There are two things I don't understand about this problem. First, when finding the nth root of a number, there should in theory be n solutions. However, the formula produces n+1 roots. Here is how. The first root is simply ##\left(r\right)^{\left(\frac{1}{n}\right)}##. Then you multiply this first root by n additional expressions given by the formula, as you go through k=0,1,...n-1. So you end up with n+1 roots, which cannot be correct. Let me illustrate what I mean. For this...
Back
Top