Old Book Review - Classical Charged Particles

pmb_phy
Messages
2,950
Reaction score
1
Old Book Review - "Classical Charged Particles"

Hi folks

I've picked up a rather old book. It was written back in 1965 by Fritz Rohrlich and is called "Classical Charged Particles". I found this book by a reference in Jackson's EM text. I have to say that this is a superb book! I don't think I've read anything as good as this book before. The first chapter is called Philosophy and Logic of Physical Theory. Excellant chapter on what science and physics is and the nature of what it means to be a "Law
of Physics" and what it means for something to be a "Theory".

This text is quite excellant regarding special and general relativity as well. The nice thing is that it explains GR and what a gravitational field is (e.g. what is the "strength" of the field etc) as I've tried to explain it here in the past. I disagree with the author's opinions in a few places but that doesn't mean this isn't a superb text. I highly recommend reading this book! You won't regret it!

Pete
 
Physics news on Phys.org
One nice thing about this book is that it addresses a complex question that is sometimes asked in this forum. The question has to do with charged particles in a g-field. The section is called Is the Principle of Equivalence Principle Valid for Charged Particles? I know of no other text which addresses this point.

Pete
 
Thread 'Can this experiment break Lorentz symmetry?'
1. The Big Idea: According to Einstein’s relativity, all motion is relative. You can’t tell if you’re moving at a constant velocity without looking outside. But what if there is a universal “rest frame” (like the old idea of the “ether”)? This experiment tries to find out by looking for tiny, directional differences in how objects move inside a sealed box. 2. How It Works: The Two-Stage Process Imagine a perfectly isolated spacecraft (our lab) moving through space at some unknown speed V...
Does the speed of light change in a gravitational field depending on whether the direction of travel is parallel to the field, or perpendicular to the field? And is it the same in both directions at each orientation? This question could be answered experimentally to some degree of accuracy. Experiment design: Place two identical clocks A and B on the circumference of a wheel at opposite ends of the diameter of length L. The wheel is positioned upright, i.e., perpendicular to the ground...
According to the General Theory of Relativity, time does not pass on a black hole, which means that processes they don't work either. As the object becomes heavier, the speed of matter falling on it for an observer on Earth will first increase, and then slow down, due to the effect of time dilation. And then it will stop altogether. As a result, we will not get a black hole, since the critical mass will not be reached. Although the object will continue to attract matter, it will not be a...
Back
Top