Why Does the Shell Theorem Lemma Allow Multiplication by \cos \varphi?

  • Thread starter Thread starter TMO
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Shell Theorem
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the application of the shell theorem and the justification for multiplying by cos(φ) in the context of vector forces. The concern is about simplifying the expression by projecting the force contribution (dF) along the radius vector (r). The multiplication by cos(φ) is explained as a result of the dot product, which captures the component of the force in the direction of the radius vector. This projection is crucial for accurately calculating the net force in spherical coordinates. Understanding this relationship is essential for applying the shell theorem correctly.
TMO
Messages
45
Reaction score
1
320px-Shell-diag-1.png


I am concerned regarding a lemma of the shell theorem. Specifically, I am concerned with the idea that due to the vector nature of the forces, that one can simplify this:

271c7a94be4496a99e2534e2ceae7751.png


into this:

63898081c163a2fc2c132f68be1bf017.png


Could somebody precisely explain why we're allowed to multiply in the \cos \varphi in the second equation?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
It's a dot product with the radius unit vector. You're projecting the contribution of dF (which I'm inferring is along s) along the radius vector r
 
So I know that electrons are fundamental, there's no 'material' that makes them up, it's like talking about a colour itself rather than a car or a flower. Now protons and neutrons and quarks and whatever other stuff is there fundamentally, I want someone to kind of teach me these, I have a lot of questions that books might not give the answer in the way I understand. Thanks
Back
Top