On/Off Ratio Limits: Practical Lower Limit for Logic Functionality

  • Thread starter Thread starter ZeroFunGame
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Limit Ratio
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the practical limits of the on/off current ratio (Ion/Ioff) for CMOS logic devices, emphasizing that while typical ratios range from 10^6 to 10^10, lower limits exist that can affect functionality. The uniformity of the device plays a crucial role, as variations in voltage and current can necessitate a larger gap between on and off states to ensure reliable operation. A lower Ion/Ioff ratio can lead to higher static current consumption, which may cause thermal issues and inefficiencies, but does not inherently prevent logic functionality. The trade-off between speed and power consumption is highlighted, with applications dictating the acceptable limits for Ion/Ioff ratios. Ultimately, while there is no strict lower limit, practical considerations such as switching speed and thermal management impose constraints on the design of CMOS circuits.
ZeroFunGame
Messages
93
Reaction score
5
TL;DR Summary
When does an on/off ratio become impractical? I've read that typical CMOS devices have an on/off ratio of 10^6-10^10. Is there a lower limit that prevents logic devices from functioning appropriately? As in, what is a practical lower limit for the on/off ratio but still enable logic functionality?
When does an on/off ratio become impractical? I've read that typical CMOS devices have an on/off ratio of 10^6-10^10. Is there a lower limit that prevents logic devices from functioning appropriately? As in, what is a practical lower limit for the on/off ratio but still enable logic functionality?
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
That depends upon the "uniformity" of the device. If the device were perfect you wouldn't need any space between "on" and "off". But in a real device there are always slight jumps in the voltage (or current or what ever the device is monitoring). In order to avoid functioning properly the interval must be larger than any such jump.
 
HallsofIvy said:
That depends upon the "uniformity" of the device. If the device were perfect you wouldn't need any space between "on" and "off". But in a real device there are always slight jumps in the voltage (or current or what ever the device is monitoring). In order to avoid functioning properly the interval must be larger than any such jump.

Is there a formula that quantifies this? Seems to me like it would be a function a temperature.
 
ZeroFunGame said:
When does an on/off ratio become impractical?
The ratio can be infinite, assuming you have enough patience.

Are you asking what the minimum pulse width is that can be generated by CMOS logic?
 
Fast CMOS logic requires that the gate voltage thresholds separating on and off be narrow and so quick to transit.
There is also a competing need to minimise current flowing through the off transistor of the pair.
The current Ion/Ioff ratio is a measure of the design quality.
 
ZeroFunGame said:
When does an on/off ratio become impractical?
When the ratio is high, the static current consumption is low, the gate voltage transition is wide, so the gate is slow.
When the ratio is low, the current consumption is high, the gate voltage transition is narrow, but the gate is fast.

The tradeoff is between static current consumption and speed. The practical limit to current ratio depends on the application, does it require speed or low power.
 
On/off means square wave, combined with high frequencies makes me think about ringing and Gibbs phenomenon.
 
It would it have helped if the word current had appeared in post #1.
The Ion/Ioff ratio is a figure of merit for switches.
 
  • Like
Likes Borek
Yes, I meant to say Ion/Ioff ratio.

For example, can logic circuits be built with an Ion/Ioff ratio of 1000? 100? 10? 2?

Where is the limit and why? Is there a rule of thumb? Trying to understand if there's a quantitative rational for a minimum Ion/Ioff ratio
 
  • #10
ZeroFunGame said:
Where is the limit and why? Is there a rule of thumb? Trying to understand if there's a quantitative rationale for a minimum Ion/Ioff ratio
(fixed one typo in your post) :smile:

One limitation is that when you are designing ICs with CMOS gates and logic, you are trying to use the smallest geometry (smallest feature size) available, so your die are smaller which makes them cheaper to make, in general. If you try to use too cutting-edge of a geometry, there can be other costs that offset the increased number of die, but as long as you stay with the smallest standard process/geometry for your type of IC, that usually helps to minimize the cost per die.

But as you go to smaller and smaller geometries, the leakage current of the transistors increases. In fact you reach a point where the power consumption due to leakage current is comparable to the C*f current (the switching currents to the gate capacitances). That's where your "Ioff" will start to be a larger fraction of your "Ion" current.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Moore's_law

The physical limits to transistor scaling have been reached due to source-to-drain leakage, limited gate metals and limited options for channel material. Other approaches are being investigated, which do not rely on physical scaling. These include the spin state of electron spintronics, tunnel junctions, and advanced confinement of channel materials via nano-wire geometry.[139] Spin-based logic and memory options are being developed actively labs.[140][141]
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes dlgoff
  • #11
Fabrication difficulties aside, I was think more from a circuit design perspective. Can you create functional ICs using low Ion/Ioff ratios? I've read that a ratio of 100 is insufficient for CMOS logic, but was unable to understand why, and I assume this is from a noise or circuit design limitation perspective that I'm not able to abstract out to and quantify.
 
  • #12
ZeroFunGame said:
I've read that a ratio of 100 is insufficient for CMOS logic, but was unable to understand why,..
Because the idle or quiescent current when not being clocked would be higher than necessary.

With CMOS, the ON current only flows while the gate is in transition. But the leakage and OFF currents flow continuously through every transistor on the chip, always.
 
  • #13
Baluncore said:
Because the idle or quiescent current when not being clocked would be higher than necessary.

With CMOS, the ON current only flows while the gate is in transition. But the leakage and OFF currents flow continuously through every transistor on the chip, always.

But this just means you have higher power consumption/electrical loss. It does not necessarily limit the on/off ratio from appropriate logic functionality.

Also, you can have low loss and low drive current. Losses aren't necessarily an issue if both off state and on state have low current.
 
  • #14
ZeroFunGame said:
But this just means you have higher power consumption/electrical loss. It does not necessarily limit the on/off ratio from appropriate logic functionality.

Also, you can have low loss and low drive current. Losses aren't necessarily an issue if both off state and on state have low current.
Low ratio does not prevent operation of a single gate, but it costs more to run.

Off current heats a chip with 10 million transistors and causes thermal offsets that make the chip unreliable, hot and uncompetitive in the marketplace.
 
  • #15
Why would low ratio cost more to run? Typical low power Ion/Ioff is 1000 mA/mm and 1E-4 mA/mm

As mentioned before, you can have low loss and low drive current. Losses aren't necessarily an issue if both off state and on state have low current.

That is, your Ion is 1E-3 mA/mm and Ioff is 1E-4mA/mm

This is much lower power if you want to compare thermals.

The question then becomes, why is this on/off ratio insufficient? What are the limitations? Is there a cutoff point when the ratio becomes reasonable for logic applications?
 
  • #16
ZeroFunGame said:
Typical low power Ion/Ioff is 1000 mA/mm and 1E-4 mA/mm
What does this mean? I don't understand your units...

ZeroFunGame said:
That is, your Ion is 1E-3 mA/mm and Ioff is 1E-4mA/mm

This is much lower power if you want to compare thermals.

The question then becomes, why is this on/off ratio insufficient?
Why waste all that current when off? Why have an off current of 100uA when it could be in the nanoAmp range?
 
  • #17
  • #19
I said please see Table 7.1. I chose the units and values based on what is quoted from the ITRS. It's just an example to get at the heart of my question.

Going from what you said, yes, why not have an Ion of 10 nanoamps and Ioff of 1 nanoamp. The fundamental inquiry is the same.

Is this on/off ratio insufficient? Why and what are the limitations? Is there a cutoff point when the ratio becomes reasonable for logic applications?
 
  • #20
ZeroFunGame said:
I said please see Table 7.1.
Oops, apologies, I missed that. So that table is on Page 2 of the document:

1578596660108.png

So you slightly mis-quoted it. The units of Ion/W are mA/mm. So it's a measure of current versus channel width, it would seem.

ZeroFunGame said:
Ion of 10 nanoamps
Most of the current in CMOS logic is switching current, determined by the C*f values.

I(t) = C \frac{dV(t)}{dt}

If you can only drive 10nA, that will limit how fast your circuit can run.
 
  • #21
So then there is no fundamental lower limit to Ion/Ioff for logic applications if switching speed was not an issue?
 
  • #22
ZeroFunGame said:
So then there is no fundamental lower limit to Ion/Ioff for logic applications if switching speed was not an issue?
Switching speed is an issue in every practical circuit application that comes to mind for me.

Do you have an application in mind, or is this just a strange thought experiment?
 
  • #23
berkeman said:
Switching speed is an issue in every practical circuit application that comes to mind for me.

Do you have an application in mind, or is this just a strange thought experiment?

It's a thought experiment. Trying to tease out the fundamental limitations rather than setting an application and then deriving the specifications. It's much easier to derive targets from a platform, but this hides the fundamental limitations in the underlying technology
 
  • #24
ZeroFunGame said:
It's a thought experiment. Trying to tease out the fundamental limitations rather than setting an application and then deriving the specifications. It's much easier to derive targets from a platform, but this hides the fundamental limitations in the underlying technology
So here is a simple CMOS building block. Can you say a bit about what it is, and what it is used for? Also, as you lower the Ion value closer to the leakage current Ileak, what kinds of limiting factors can you envision? (assuming very slow operation like you were asking about)

https://www.tutorialspoint.com/vlsi_design/images/implementation_of_clocked_nor.jpg

1578613583837.png
 
  • #25
ZeroFunGame said:
Yes, I meant to say Ion/Ioff ratio.

For example, can logic circuits be built with an Ion/Ioff ratio of 1000? 100? 10? 2?

Where is the limit and why? Is there a rule of thumb? Trying to understand if there's a quantitative rational for a minimum Ion/Ioff ratio
Old IIC logic family had on/off current ratios of about 3000. This is at lower limits of practical highly integrated circuits. Modern low-voltage CMOS operating around 0.8V power supply voltage typically have on-off ratio about 10000.
Yes, this is mostly rule of thumb. Typically with more switches maximal parameter deviation increase, eroding on/off margin. In modern CMOS the problem with parameters variation may happen not only with transistors, but also with tungsten contacts to metal lines (which are actually smallest part of transistor - smaller than even gate)
 
Back
Top