On the formation of larger bodies in space after dust attraction.

AI Thread Summary
When a smaller asteroid strikes a larger one at an angle, the impact generates two vectors: one parallel and one perpendicular to the larger asteroid's path. If the perpendicular energy is absorbed, only the parallel vector remains, allowing debris to move together in orbit. This clustering of particles can lead to eventual coalescence, maintaining the original velocities of the asteroids involved. However, in regions like the asteroid belt between Mars and Jupiter, gravitational influences, particularly from Jupiter, prevent these bodies from forming a planet. The discussion highlights the dynamics of asteroid collisions and their implications for the formation of larger celestial bodies.
Novawatcher
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
When a (say 50 meters) asteroid 'A' strikes a larger (say 500 meters) ‘equally hard’ asteroid 'B' at a small angle to the asteroid 'B' would have two vectors, one large vector parallel to the asteroid 'B', another second small vector perpendicular to the asteroid 'B'.
.
If the small amount of energy of the perpendicular vector is diminished or absorbed by the asteroid (other than asteroid 'A' being absorbed or bouncing off at an opposed angle), all that remains would be the vector parallel to the asteroid 'B' path.
.
Thus, since the great majority of debris in the solar system has the same orbital direction, this would result in clusters of particles (asteroids) moving in orbit together.
.
Sooner or later the result would be the cluster slowly coalescing. Any original velocities of the two objects ('A' & 'B') would retained but a conjunctive focus for a third order interception point would be created. Ω
 
Last edited:
Astronomy news on Phys.org
Did you have a question?
 
An example I can think of is the asteroid belt between Mars and Jupiter. Those bodies will never coallesce to form a planet to due tidal disruption from Jupiter.
 
Publication: Redox-driven mineral and organic associations in Jezero Crater, Mars Article: NASA Says Mars Rover Discovered Potential Biosignature Last Year Press conference The ~100 authors don't find a good way this could have formed without life, but also can't rule it out. Now that they have shared their findings with the larger community someone else might find an explanation - or maybe it was actually made by life.
TL;DR Summary: In 3 years, the Square Kilometre Array (SKA) telescope (or rather, a system of telescopes) should be put into operation. In case of failure to detect alien signals, it will further expand the radius of the so-called silence (or rather, radio silence) of the Universe. Is there any sense in this or is blissful ignorance better? In 3 years, the Square Kilometre Array (SKA) telescope (or rather, a system of telescopes) should be put into operation. In case of failure to detect...
This thread is dedicated to the beauty and awesomeness of our Universe. If you feel like it, please share video clips and photos (or nice animations) of space and objects in space in this thread. Your posts, clips and photos may by all means include scientific information; that does not make it less beautiful to me (n.b. the posts must of course comply with the PF guidelines, i.e. regarding science, only mainstream science is allowed, fringe/pseudoscience is not allowed). n.b. I start this...
Back
Top