On the orthogonality of Sturm-Liouville eigenvectors

AI Thread Summary
Solutions to the Sturm-Liouville differential equation (SLDE) are orthogonal under the condition that they satisfy homogeneous boundary conditions, as indicated by the integral equation involving eigenvalues. If the boundary conditions are inhomogeneous, the orthogonality may not hold. Additionally, when two eigenvalues are equal, the corresponding solutions can be linearly independent, but their orthogonality is not guaranteed within the same eigensubspace. The discussion emphasizes the importance of boundary conditions in determining orthogonality and the nuances of eigenvalues in SLDE solutions. Overall, the relationship between boundary conditions and orthogonality in SLDE is critical for understanding the behavior of its eigenvectors.
mjordan2nd
Messages
173
Reaction score
1
From what I understand, solutions to the Sturm-Liouville differential equation (SLDE) are considered to be orthogonal because of the following statement:

\left( \lambda_m-\lambda_n \right) \int_a^b w(x) y_m(x)y_n(x) dx = 0

My first question involves the assumptions that go into this equation. One of the assumptions that go into this equation is that the solutions to the SLDE satisfy the Dirichlet, Neumann, or mixed homogeneous boundary conditions, correct? If the boundary conditions were inhomogeneous then the above equation would not necessarily be true, correct? Is it then correct to say that solutions to the SLDE are only orthogonal if they satisfy homogeneous boundary conditions?

My second question involves the case when \lambda_m=\lambda_n. Since the SLDE is a second order ordinary differential equation there should be two linearly independent solutions for each eigenvalue. So even if \lambda_m=\lambda_n, that doesn't necessarily mean y_m=y_n. In this case, it is not clear that these two solutions are orthogonal. I can buy that every eigensubspace of the SLDE is orthogonal to the others, however what about two vectors belonging to the same subspace?

Thanks.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I can't answer your specific question, but I think you would do better if you put this into one of the math forums.
 
mathman said:
I can't answer your specific question, but I think you would do better if you put this into one of the math forums.

Noted, and thank you. Will put it there.
 
I think it's easist first to watch a short vidio clip I find these videos very relaxing to watch .. I got to thinking is this being done in the most efficient way? The sand has to be suspended in the water to move it to the outlet ... The faster the water , the more turbulance and the sand stays suspended, so it seems to me the rule of thumb is the hose be aimed towards the outlet at all times .. Many times the workers hit the sand directly which will greatly reduce the water...
Back
Top