On the Validity of Swapping Dummy Indices in Tensor Manipulation

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the validity of swapping dummy indices in tensor manipulation, specifically in the context of proving that a symmetric tensor \( T_{i_1 i_2} \) remains symmetric under rotations. The transformation law under rotation is defined as \( T_{i_1 i_2}' = r_{i_1 j_1} r_{i_2 j_2} T_{j_1 j_2} \). The conclusion drawn is that the property of symmetry is preserved, as demonstrated by the manipulation of indices and the application of property (a), which states that a tensor vanishing in one frame vanishes in all related frames.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of tensor notation and operations
  • Familiarity with rotation matrices and their properties
  • Knowledge of symmetric tensors and their definitions
  • Basic grasp of linear algebra concepts, particularly summation over indices
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the properties of symmetric tensors in more depth
  • Learn about the implications of tensor transformations under different coordinate systems
  • Investigate the role of dummy indices in tensor calculus
  • Explore advanced topics in linear algebra, such as eigenvalues and eigenvectors of tensors
USEFUL FOR

Mathematicians, physicists, and engineers working with tensor analysis, particularly those involved in fields such as continuum mechanics, general relativity, and material science.

Wannabe Physicist
Messages
17
Reaction score
3
Homework Statement
Using property (a), show that a symmetric tensor ##T_{i_1 i_2 }## remains symmetric under all rotations.
Relevant Equations
(1) Transformation law under rotation: ##T_{i_1 i_2 }' = r_{i_1 j_1} r_{i_2 j_2} T_{j_1 j_2}##
(2) Definition of symmetric tensor: ##T_{i_1 i_2} - T_{i_2 i_1} = 0##
Property (a) simply states that a second rank tensor that vanishes in one frame vanishes in all frames related by rotations.

I am supposed to prove: ##T_{i_1 i_2} - T_{i_2 i_1} = 0 \implies T_{i_1 i_2}' - T_{i_2 i_1}' = 0##

Here's my solution. Consider,

$$T_{i_1 i_2}' - T_{i_2 i_1}' = r_{i_1 j_1} r_{i_2 j_2} T_{j_1 j_2} - r_{i_2 j_1} r_{i_1 j_2} T_{j_1 j_2}$$

**Now consider this statement:** Because ##j_1## and ##j_2## are dummy indices and both are summed from 1 to 3, we can swap these indices exclusively for the second term in the above expression.

If I assume the above statement it is easy to obtain

$$T_{i_1 i_2}' - T_{i_2 i_1}' = r_{i_1 j_1} r_{i_2 j_2} T_{j_1 j_2} - r_{i_2 j_2} r_{i_1 j_1} T_{j_2 j_1}$$
$$T_{i_1 i_2}' - T_{i_2 i_1}' = r_{i_1 j_1} r_{i_2 j_2} [T_{j_1 j_2} - T_{j_2 j_1}]$$And then using property (a), I can prove the required statement.

But I am not sure if the statement of swapping indices is valid.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: vanhees71
Physics news on Phys.org
Wannabe Physicist said:
Homework Statement:: Using property (a), show that a symmetric tensor ##T_{i_1 i_2 }## remains symmetric under all rotations.
Relevant Equations:: (1) Transformation law under rotation: ##T_{i_1 i_2 }' = r_{i_1 j_1} r_{i_2 j_2} T_{j_1 j_2}##
(2) Definition of symmetric tensor: ##T_{i_1 i_2} - T_{i_2 i_1} = 0##

But I am not sure if the statement of swapping indices is valid.
It simply says obviously
\sum_{i=1}^n A_i B_i=\sum_{j=1}^n A_j B_j=\sum_{\gamma=1}^n A_\gamma B_\gamma
where ##\gamma=\{a,b,c,...,\alpha,\beta,...,\xi,\eta,\zeta,...\}## any symbol you like.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: vanhees71
Oh right! Thanks a lot!
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
5K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
4K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
3K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
Replies
8
Views
2K