One-Dimensional Motion with Constant Acceleration

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around calculating the distance a rock falls in the first 7 seconds of free fall from a cliff, using the equation X = Xo + VoT + 1/2AT^2. The initial position (Xo) can be set to zero at the top of the cliff, simplifying the calculation since the difference in position is what's important. The initial velocity (Vo) is zero because the rock is released from rest. The acceleration due to gravity (g) can be treated as either positive or negative, depending on the chosen coordinate system. Understanding the underlying principles of motion is emphasized over rote memorization of formulas.
PhysicallyAbel
Messages
26
Reaction score
1

Homework Statement


A rock is released from rest from the top of a very high cliff, and accelerates downward at g.
Approximately how far does the rock travel in the first 7 seconds of its free-fall? (Assume no air friction.)

Homework Equations


X=Xo+VoT+1/2AT^2

The Attempt at a Solution


I understand how to work out the problem, but I do not know why it works. You simply substitute the numbers into get the distance. But for some reason, you are not given (nor do you use) initial position like the equation calls for. Can someone explain why it's simply thrown away? The initial position can't be 0, as it's being dropped from a mountain.[/B]
 
Physics news on Phys.org
PhysicallyAbel said:

Homework Statement


A rock is released from rest from the top of a very high cliff, and accelerates downward at g.
Approximately how far does the rock travel in the first 7 seconds of its free-fall? (Assume no air friction.)

Homework Equations


X=Xo+VoT+1/2AT^2

The Attempt at a Solution


I understand how to work out the problem, but I do not know why it works. You simply substitute the numbers into get the distance. But for some reason, you are not given (nor do you use) initial position like the equation calls for. Can someone explain why it's simply thrown away? The initial position can't be 0, as it's being dropped from a mountain.[/B]

The question is asking how far the rock travels. That's the difference between the final position and the initial position. ##x_0## cancels when you take the difference.
 
It sounds like you are memorizing formulas without really understanding them. That's a bad idea. You are free to take the "0" point any where you want. I suggest taking x= 0 at the top of the cliff. Further, the fact that rock is "released from rest" tells you that the initial velocity is 0. Finally, you can take the acceleration due to gravity to be either negative or positive- as long as you interpret the results in the same way- you are free to choose "positive" or "negative" either up or down.
 
  • Like
Likes Chestermiller
You can ignore the mountain altogether : you have a ( constant ) acceleration rate, a starting velocity (u = 0) and a time ( 7 seconds ), so use Newtons rules of motion.
 
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Back
Top