One-dimensional wave equation with non-constant speed

j5rp
Messages
4
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



The cross-section of a long string (string along the x axis) is not constant, but it changes wit the coordinate x sinusoidally. Explore how a wave, caused with a short stroke, spreads through the string.


Homework Equations



Relevant is the one-dimensional wave equation, where the wave speed c is not a constant (i.e. c=√T/ρS, where T is the string tension, ρ is the density of the string, and S is the cross-section).

The cross-section:
S=S1+S2*Sin[x]


The Attempt at a Solution



I thought about using Laplace transformation so that I get an ordinary differential equation. I also have trouble with the initial conditions, I don't know what is meant by short stroke, or if it really matters.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I interpret 'short stroke' as simply meaning it is a small perturbation.
Can you write down the wave equation?
 
The wave equation:

(∂^2 u)/(∂t)^2 = c^2 (∂^2 u)/(∂x)^2,

where u is displacement of the string and c is the wave speed. c is not a constant, because c^2 = T/S, where T is the string tension and S is the cross-sectional area and is dependant on x. S[x]=S1+S2*Sin[x].

(Sorry about the formatting. The ∂ stands for derivative.)
 
j5rp said:
The wave equation:

(∂^2 u)/(∂t)^2 = c^2 (∂^2 u)/(∂x)^2,

where u is displacement of the string and c is the wave speed. c is not a constant, because c^2 = T/S, where T is the string tension and S is the cross-sectional area and is dependant on x. S[x]=S1+S2*Sin[x].

(Sorry about the formatting. The ∂ stands for derivative.)

In LaTeX: ##\frac{\partial^2 u}{\partial t^2} = c^2\frac{\partial^2 u}{\partial x^2}##.
So, plugging in the expression for c(x), can you apply e.g. separation of variables?
 
So, plugging in the expression for c(x), can you apply e.g. separation of variables?

I think not, because the initial conditions are probably going to be in the form u(t=0,x)=f(x) and \frac{∂u}{∂t}(t=0,x)=g(x), because it is an infinite string (no boundary conditions). But if I we separate variables (i.e. u(x,t)=X(x)*T(t)), we have to put a single value and not a function for initial conditions (example: X(0)=value, instead of u(t=0,x)= function).

I was wandering if d'Alembert's formula applies if speed of propagation (also c in the link) is not constant?
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top