How Does the One-Dimensional Wave Equation Model Tensile Forces in a String?

mSSM
Messages
31
Reaction score
1

Homework Statement



Reading the very first chapter of Weinberger's First Course in PDEs, I stumbled over the derivation of the tensile force in the horizontal direction. The question was posted already in this thread: https://www.physicsforums.com/threads/one-dimensional-wave-equation.531397/

And the first answer provides the following solution:
$$
T(s,t)\cos\theta = T(s,t)\frac{\frac{\partial x}{\partial s}}{\sqrt{\left(\frac{\partial x}{\partial s}\right)^2+\left(\frac{\partial y}{\partial s}\right)^2}}
\text{.}
$$

Homework Equations


What leads to the above equation? Why write the the denominator in this form? Isn't it just equal to one?

The Attempt at a Solution


The slope of the string at the point ##s##is obviously given by ##\tan\theta = \frac{\partial y}{\partial x} = \left(\frac{\partial y}{\partial s}\right) \left(\frac{\partial x}{\partial s}\right)^{-1}##, which, if I understand that correctly, simply translates to ##\frac{\sin\theta}{\cos\theta} =\left(\frac{\partial y}{\partial s}\right) \left(\frac{\partial s}{\partial x}\right)##. Is that part correct so far?

Now, this leads me directly to:
$$
T(s,t)\cos\theta = T(s,t) \frac{\sin\theta}{\tan\theta} = T(s,t) \frac{\partial y}{\partial s} \cdot \frac{\frac{\partial x}{\partial s}}{\frac{\partial y}{\partial s}} = T(s,t) \frac{\partial x}{\partial s}
\text{.}
$$

Where exactly is the above-mentioned denominator coming from?

I also notice that
$$
T(s,t)\cos\theta =T(s,t) \frac{\partial x}{\partial s} = T(s,t) \frac{\partial x}{\sqrt{\left(\partial x\right)^2+\left( \partial y\right)^2}}
\text{,}
$$
where multiplication by ##\partial s## in the numerator and denominator leads to:
$$
T(s,t)\cos\theta = T(s,t)\frac{\frac{\partial x}{\partial s}}{\sqrt{\left(\frac{\partial x}{\partial s}\right)^2+\left(\frac{\partial y}{\partial s}\right)^2}}
\text{.}
$$

But from the definition of cosine and sine we have:
$$
\left(\frac{\partial x}{\partial s}\right)^2+\left(\frac{\partial y}{\partial s}\right)^2 = \cos^2\theta + \sin^2\theta =1
\text{,}
$$
and thus
$$
T(s,t)\cos\theta = T(s,t)\frac{\frac{\partial x}{\partial s}}{\sqrt{\left(\frac{\partial x}{\partial s}\right)^2+\left(\frac{\partial y}{\partial s}\right)^2}} = T(s,t) \frac{\partial x}{\partial s}
\text{.}
$$

So what's the point of writing the expression in the way the author is doing in the book? I am sure there is something I am missing?
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
mSSM said:

Homework Statement



Reading the very first chapter of Weinberger's First Course in PDEs, I stumbled over the derivation of the tensile force in the horizontal direction. The question was posted already in this thread: https://www.physicsforums.com/threads/one-dimensional-wave-equation.531397/

And the first answer provides the following solution:
$$
T(s,t)\cos\theta = T(s,t)\frac{\frac{\partial x}{\partial s}}{\sqrt{\left(\frac{\partial x}{\partial s}\right)^2+\left(\frac{\partial y}{\partial s}\right)^2}}
\text{.}
$$

Homework Equations


What leads to the above equation? Why write the the denominator in this form? Isn't it just equal to one?

No, it's not 1 because the string stretches. As described in the original source, s for a point on the string is the x-coordinate that that point would have had if the string were unstretched, straight, and parallel to the x-axis.

If you have a section of string running from s=s_1 to s=s_2, then the unstretched length of that section would be

L = |s_2 - s_1| = \delta s

The stretched length would be given by:
L' = \sqrt{\delta x^2 + \delta y^2} = \sqrt{\frac{\partial x}{\partial s}^2 + \frac{\partial y}{\partial s}^2} \delta s

In general, L' > L.
 
stevendaryl said:
No, it's not 1 because the string stretches. As described in the original source, s for a point on the string is the x-coordinate that that point would have had if the string were unstretched, straight, and parallel to the x-axis.

If you have a section of string running from s=s_1 to s=s_2, then the unstretched length of that section would be

L = |s_2 - s_1| = \delta s

The stretched length would be given by:
L' = \sqrt{\delta x^2 + \delta y^2} = \sqrt{\frac{\partial x}{\partial s}^2 + \frac{\partial y}{\partial s}^2} \delta s

In general, L' > L.

Thank you for your reply.

So if ##L'## is the stretched length as described by you, then the needed equation above follows immediately. I am, however, still not sure about that ##L'##. Can you explain where your last equation comes from (as shown below; I have added parenthesis where I thought you wanted them)?
$$
L' = \sqrt{\left(\frac{\partial x}{\partial s}\right)^2 + \left(\frac{\partial y}{\partial s}\right)^2} \delta s
$$

Are ##\delta x^2## and ##\delta y^2## referring to the non-equilibrium, stretched state of the string? In other words, let ##\delta x'## and ##\delta s'## refer to the stretched state of the string; then:
$$
\cos \theta = \frac{\delta x'}{\delta s'}
$$

Now writing for ##\delta s'##
$$
\delta s' = \sqrt{\left(\delta x' \right)^2 + \left(\delta y' \right)^2} \frac{\delta s}{\delta s} = \sqrt{\left(\frac{\partial x'}{\partial s} \right)^2 + \left(\frac{\partial y'}{\partial s} \right)^2} \delta s
$$

Finally, renaming ##x' \rightarrow x## and ##y' \rightarrow y## I recover your equation.

So is that all there is? Is it essentially just multiplying the RHS by ##\frac{\delta s}{\delta s}##, effectively turning the equation into a differential?

I believe I was most confused about the notation. :)
 
You can think of it this way: Take the unstretched string and imagine holding it straight and drawing a black mark each millimeter. Then s counts which mark you're talking about. x and y are not me If you have a piece of stretched string, then s_1 is the mark on one end, and s_2 is the mark on the other end. x_1 is the x-position of the first end, x_2 is the x-position of the other end. y_1 and y_2 are the y-positions of the two ends.

string.jpg

In the above figures, Figure 1 shows an unstretched piece of string, colored red. The unstretched length is L = 8 mm. s runs from s_1 = 0 to s_2 = 8.Now we stretch the piece of string, so that now the string runs from (x=0, y=4) to (x=12, y=-4), as shown in Figure 2. \delta x = 12, \delta y = -8. That's the change in x and y from one end of the string to the other. The length of the string is now L' = \sqrt{\delta x^2 + \delta y^2} = \sqrt{12^2 + 8^2} = 14.42 mm.

An alternative way to calculate the same L' is to use L' = \sqrt{(\frac{dx}{ds})^2 + (\frac{dy}{ds})^2} \delta s.

\frac{dx}{ds} = \frac{12}{8} = 1.5
\frac{dy}{ds} = 1
\sqrt{(\frac{dx}{ds})^2 + (\frac{dy}{ds})^2} = 1.802
L' = 1.802* 8 mm = 14.42 mm<br /> <br /> Note: s is defined so that \delta s doesn't change when you stretch it, but L' does.
 
Hi, I had an exam and I completely messed up a problem. Especially one part which was necessary for the rest of the problem. Basically, I have a wormhole metric: $$(ds)^2 = -(dt)^2 + (dr)^2 + (r^2 + b^2)( (d\theta)^2 + sin^2 \theta (d\phi)^2 )$$ Where ##b=1## with an orbit only in the equatorial plane. We also know from the question that the orbit must satisfy this relationship: $$\varepsilon = \frac{1}{2} (\frac{dr}{d\tau})^2 + V_{eff}(r)$$ Ultimately, I was tasked to find the initial...
The value of H equals ## 10^{3}## in natural units, According to : https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Natural_units, ## t \sim 10^{-21} sec = 10^{21} Hz ##, and since ## \text{GeV} \sim 10^{24} \text{Hz } ##, ## GeV \sim 10^{24} \times 10^{-21} = 10^3 ## in natural units. So is this conversion correct? Also in the above formula, can I convert H to that natural units , since it’s a constant, while keeping k in Hz ?
Back
Top