A One Hamiltonian formalism query - source is Goldstein's book

AI Thread Summary
In the Hamiltonian formulation of classical mechanics, the absence of constraint equations among coordinates is essential for the formulation's mathematical consistency and to ensure the independence of coordinates. This requirement contrasts with the Lagrangian formulation, where constraint equations are permissible, allowing for a broader range of systems to be analyzed. An example illustrating this difference can be seen in systems with holonomic constraints, which can be effectively handled in the Lagrangian framework but complicate the Hamiltonian approach. Although Legendre transformations can be applied to derive Hamiltonian equations from Lagrangian equations with constraints, the resulting Hamiltonian framework typically assumes independent coordinates for simplicity and clarity. Understanding these distinctions is crucial for correctly applying each formulation in classical mechanics.
swapnilp
Messages
10
Reaction score
0
In 3rd edition of Goldstein's "Classical Mechanics" book, page 335, section 8.1, it is mentioned that :

In Hamiltonian formulation, there can be no constraint equations among the co-ordinates.

Why is this necessary ? Any simple example which will elaborate this fact ?

But in Lagrangian formulation, there can be constraint equations. Then why not in Hamiltonian formulation ?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Actually you can make Legendre transformation for the Lagrange equations with constraints and obtain Hamiltonian-type equations with constraints. No problem
 
Last edited:
Thread 'Question about pressure of a liquid'
I am looking at pressure in liquids and I am testing my idea. The vertical tube is 100m, the contraption is filled with water. The vertical tube is very thin(maybe 1mm^2 cross section). The area of the base is ~100m^2. Will he top half be launched in the air if suddenly it cracked?- assuming its light enough. I want to test my idea that if I had a thin long ruber tube that I lifted up, then the pressure at "red lines" will be high and that the $force = pressure * area$ would be massive...
I feel it should be solvable we just need to find a perfect pattern, and there will be a general pattern since the forces acting are based on a single function, so..... you can't actually say it is unsolvable right? Cause imaging 3 bodies actually existed somwhere in this universe then nature isn't gonna wait till we predict it! And yea I have checked in many places that tiny changes cause large changes so it becomes chaos........ but still I just can't accept that it is impossible to solve...
Hello! I am generating electrons from a 3D gaussian source. The electrons all have the same energy, but the direction is isotropic. The electron source is in between 2 plates that act as a capacitor, and one of them acts as a time of flight (tof) detector. I know the voltage on the plates very well, and I want to extract the center of the gaussian distribution (in one direction only), by measuring the tof of many electrons. So the uncertainty on the position is given by the tof uncertainty...
Back
Top