One mass on, one half off, attached by a string

  • Thread starter Thread starter issisoccer10
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Mass String
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on a physics problem involving two equal masses, A and B, connected by a massless string of length L. When mass B is dropped from a position L/2 away from the edge of a cliff, it is concluded that mass A will reach the edge of the cliff before mass B does. This is due to the increasing radius of the arc that mass B must travel as it falls, preventing it from hitting the edge of the cliff while mass A moves directly towards it.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of basic physics concepts such as motion and forces
  • Familiarity with the principles of pendulum motion
  • Knowledge of the concept of tension in strings
  • Ability to visualize two-dimensional motion
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the principles of pendulum motion and its effects on connected masses
  • Explore the concept of tension in strings and its role in motion
  • Learn about projectile motion and its relation to falling objects
  • Investigate the effects of mass distribution in connected systems
USEFUL FOR

Students of physics, educators teaching mechanics, and anyone interested in understanding the dynamics of connected masses and motion in gravitational fields.

issisoccer10
Messages
35
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Two equal masses (A and B) are attaced by a massless string of length L. Mass A is on a cliff and B is being held even with the cliff but a length L/2 away from the edge. If you drop mass B from this position, would mass B swing down and hit the edge of the cliff before mass A reaches the edge of the cliff?


Homework Equations


No equations are necessary according to the problem



The Attempt at a Solution


I'm just supposed to explain my reasoning for my answer. So my answer goes...

Mass A would reach the edge of the cliff because as mass B falls and pulls on A, the radius of the arc that B would need to make to reach the edge of the cliff would continually increase, thus not allowing B to hit the edge of the cliff.

Does this make sense or am I just making stuff up? Is there a better "logical" explanation that would seem to fit better with physics?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Addition... as for the actual question, mass A is L/2 away from the edge of the cliff. So the string is taut (the string won't stretch as mass B falls either).
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 29 ·
Replies
29
Views
2K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
9K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
13
Views
2K