Only using 2/3 Motion equations

  • Thread starter Thread starter Learnphysics
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Motion
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the use of the three equations of motion, highlighting that often only two are necessary for problem-solving. One participant notes that the equation involving final velocity squared is rarely used, as it typically applies when time is not known. The other two equations are deemed sufficient for most scenarios, allowing for simultaneous equations to be set up effectively. The equation for change in displacement is particularly favored for its versatility in various situations. Ultimately, understanding the definitions of displacement, velocity, and acceleration is emphasized as fundamental to applying these equations.
Learnphysics
Messages
92
Reaction score
0
We all know the three equations of motion

Final speed = initial speed + acceleration *time

change in displacement = initial speed * Time + .5 (acceleration) * (time)^2

FInal velocity ^2 = initial velocity ^2 + (2 * acceleration * displacment)


However i recall reading somewhere (possibly), that you should/can only ever use 2 out of 3 of these equations. Why is this?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I personally find that i rarely use
FInal velocity ^2 = initial velocity ^2 + (2 * acceleration * displacement) since its only used when you do not have a time and are solving for something else but with the other two you can pretty much solve for anything and even if you think you can't you can still set up simultanious equations with them. the best one of the three is probably change in displacement = initial speed * Time + .5 (acceleration) * (time)^2 since you can use it in just about any situation.
 
Really, you only need the definitions of displacement, velocity, and acceleration, and the equations follow as mathematical identities.
 
Thread 'Is 'Velocity of Transport' a Recognized Term in English Mechanics Literature?'
Here are two fragments from Banach's monograph in Mechanics I have never seen the term <<velocity of transport>> in English texts. Actually I have never seen this term being named somehow in English. This term has a name in Russian books. I looked through the original Banach's text in Polish and there is a Polish name for this term. It is a little bit surprising that the Polish name differs from the Russian one and also differs from this English translation. My question is: Is there...
Hi there, im studying nanoscience at the university in Basel. Today I looked at the topic of intertial and non-inertial reference frames and the existence of fictitious forces. I understand that you call forces real in physics if they appear in interplay. Meaning that a force is real when there is the "actio" partner to the "reactio" partner. If this condition is not satisfied the force is not real. I also understand that if you specifically look at non-inertial reference frames you can...
Back
Top