Only using 2/3 Motion equations

  • Thread starter Thread starter Learnphysics
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Motion
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the use of the three equations of motion, highlighting that often only two are necessary for problem-solving. One participant notes that the equation involving final velocity squared is rarely used, as it typically applies when time is not known. The other two equations are deemed sufficient for most scenarios, allowing for simultaneous equations to be set up effectively. The equation for change in displacement is particularly favored for its versatility in various situations. Ultimately, understanding the definitions of displacement, velocity, and acceleration is emphasized as fundamental to applying these equations.
Learnphysics
Messages
92
Reaction score
0
We all know the three equations of motion

Final speed = initial speed + acceleration *time

change in displacement = initial speed * Time + .5 (acceleration) * (time)^2

FInal velocity ^2 = initial velocity ^2 + (2 * acceleration * displacment)


However i recall reading somewhere (possibly), that you should/can only ever use 2 out of 3 of these equations. Why is this?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I personally find that i rarely use
FInal velocity ^2 = initial velocity ^2 + (2 * acceleration * displacement) since its only used when you do not have a time and are solving for something else but with the other two you can pretty much solve for anything and even if you think you can't you can still set up simultanious equations with them. the best one of the three is probably change in displacement = initial speed * Time + .5 (acceleration) * (time)^2 since you can use it in just about any situation.
 
Really, you only need the definitions of displacement, velocity, and acceleration, and the equations follow as mathematical identities.
 
Hello everyone, Consider the problem in which a car is told to travel at 30 km/h for L kilometers and then at 60 km/h for another L kilometers. Next, you are asked to determine the average speed. My question is: although we know that the average speed in this case is the harmonic mean of the two speeds, is it also possible to state that the average speed over this 2L-kilometer stretch can be obtained as a weighted average of the two speeds? Best regards, DaTario
The rope is tied into the person (the load of 200 pounds) and the rope goes up from the person to a fixed pulley and back down to his hands. He hauls the rope to suspend himself in the air. What is the mechanical advantage of the system? The person will indeed only have to lift half of his body weight (roughly 100 pounds) because he now lessened the load by that same amount. This APPEARS to be a 2:1 because he can hold himself with half the force, but my question is: is that mechanical...
Some physics textbook writer told me that Newton's first law applies only on bodies that feel no interactions at all. He said that if a body is on rest or moves in constant velocity, there is no external force acting on it. But I have heard another form of the law that says the net force acting on a body must be zero. This means there is interactions involved after all. So which one is correct?
Back
Top