Op-Amp Output Units With Oscillatory Input Voltage

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on confusion regarding the output units of an integrating op-amp circuit with an oscillatory input voltage. The main issue arises from the integration of the input voltage, which is expressed in terms of time, leading to an apparent output unit of V/s. It is clarified that using angular frequency (ω) instead of direct numerical values helps avoid confusion, as radians are not actual units. The correct approach involves expressing the input as V sin(ωt) and integrating it, resulting in units of volts when multiplied by the appropriate constants. The participant acknowledges their oversight and thanks others for the clarification.
cmmcnamara
Messages
121
Reaction score
1
Hi all,

ME major here that's very confused about the integrating op-amp. It's pretty simple what I am confused about, just unit problems.

Suppose you have the following integrating op-amp circuit:

Feedback capacitor: 10μF
Input Resistance: 10kΩ
Input Voltage: 5V[sin(100t)]

My problem arises with the units here. For an integrating op-amp the output voltage can be shown to be vo=-τ∫vi*dt . The time constant obviously has units of Hz or s^-1. However for any oscillatory input, the integration results in another oscillatory output which carries the time units inside the trig function which doesn't allow those units to cancel those of s^-1, leading to output "voltage" having units of V/s. What am I missing here? How am I wrong? I appreciate any help in advance!
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
The 100 in sin(100t) has units of radians per second. When you multiply 100\ \text{rad/s} with t seconds, you get an angle in radians. Then you can take the sine of that. The sine of something that has units of seconds is meaningless.

This is the reason why you should NEVER EVER EVER solve problems with actual numbers. Use variables and plug in the values for those variables at the end. I bet you wouldn't have had this confusion if you or the person who wrote this problem had written the oscillatory input as V_{\text{in}} = V \sin ( \omega t ) with V = 5 \ \text{volts} and \omega = 100 \ \text{rad/s}. Radians are not actual units, so it is probably easier to remember the relationship between angular frequency and plain old frequency, which is \omega = 2 \pi f. In other words, V_{\text{in}} = V \sin ( 2 \pi f t ), where f = \frac{100}{2 \pi}\ \text{Hz}.

Integrate V \sin ( 2 \pi f t ) to get - \frac{V}{2 \pi f} \cos ( \omega t ), which has units of \frac{\text{volts}}{\text{Hz}} = \text{volts} \times \text{seconds}. Now, when you multiply that by a constant that has units of \text{Hz} or 1/\text{seconds}, the result has units of \text{volts}, which is what you want.
 
Last edited:
Hahah, yea I just caught this about 30 seconds ago and was coming here to close up the thread. I normally go about everything symbolically but I've had my head up my arse with MathCAD this quarter learning to use it. Thanks so much for your response!
 
Thread 'Weird near-field phenomenon I get in my EM simulation'
I recently made a basic simulation of wire antennas and I am not sure if the near field in my simulation is modeled correctly. One of the things that worry me is the fact that sometimes I see in my simulation "movements" in the near field that seems to be faster than the speed of wave propagation I defined (the speed of light in the simulation). Specifically I see "nodes" of low amplitude in the E field that are quickly "emitted" from the antenna and then slow down as they approach the far...
Hello dear reader, a brief introduction: Some 4 years ago someone started developing health related issues, apparently due to exposure to RF & ELF related frequencies and/or fields (Magnetic). This is currently becoming known as EHS. (Electromagnetic hypersensitivity is a claimed sensitivity to electromagnetic fields, to which adverse symptoms are attributed.) She experiences a deep burning sensation throughout her entire body, leaving her in pain and exhausted after a pulse has occurred...
Back
Top