Open cover which has no finite subcover

  • Thread starter Thread starter tracedinair
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Finite
tracedinair
Messages
47
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Give an example of an open cover in R^n which has no finite subcover.

Homework Equations

The Attempt at a Solution



{x ε Q | x < sqrt(3)} U {x ε Q | x > sqrt(3) }
 
Physics news on Phys.org
None of the elements in that set is an open subset of Rn. None of them are even subsets of Rn!


Or... were you trying to say that you wanted to consider an open cover whose elements are the two sets
{x ε Q | x < sqrt(3)} and {x ε Q | x > sqrt(3) }​
? If so, you need to show four things:

(1) Those two sets are subsets of Rn
(2) Those two sets are open
(3) Those two sets cover Rn
(4) No finite subcover covers the same space as the entire cover does
 
n/m. I've figured this out.
 
Last edited:
There are two things I don't understand about this problem. First, when finding the nth root of a number, there should in theory be n solutions. However, the formula produces n+1 roots. Here is how. The first root is simply ##\left(r\right)^{\left(\frac{1}{n}\right)}##. Then you multiply this first root by n additional expressions given by the formula, as you go through k=0,1,...n-1. So you end up with n+1 roots, which cannot be correct. Let me illustrate what I mean. For this...
Back
Top