Open pipe end correction distance for waves

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on determining the end correction distance for an open pipe with one closed end, influenced by a piston. Participants express confusion about the two resonance lengths provided, questioning their significance and how to visualize them. The relationship between the pipe length and the end correction is clarified, with a suggestion to use a specific length for calculations. The importance of measuring multiple resonances to reduce error is emphasized, as well as the challenges in achieving precise resonance locations. Overall, the conversation highlights the complexities of acoustic measurements in closed-end pipes.
Bolter
Messages
262
Reaction score
31
Homework Statement
See below
Relevant Equations
frequency = speed/wavelength
Screenshot 2020-03-12 at 17.10.40.png

Struggling on how to do this Q

I have tried drawing a sketch of it and had come up with this

IMG_4076.JPG


This is probably not right, as the speed of sound is not given here as well the length of the open pipe tube?

Any help would be really great! Thanks
 
  • Like
Likes Merlin3189
Physics news on Phys.org
One end is not open. There is a piston. That will affect both end correction and resonant length.

Ps. Why do they give you two resonances?
 
Merlin3189 said:
One end is not open. There is a piston. That will affect both end correction and resonant length.

Ps. Why do they give you two resonances?

If it is a close end pipe, then the sketch should look like this then

IMG_4077.JPG


I'm not so sure why myself of why they give 2 resonance here

What do I make out of the 2 resonant lengths given here?
 
  • Like
Likes Merlin3189
Well, what will the diagram look like for the longer tube resonance?

What do you know about the difference between the two lengths?
 
Merlin3189 said:
Well, what will the diagram look like for the longer tube resonance?

What do you know about the difference between the two lengths?

The resonance for the longer tube would look something like this?

CC01F886-40BB-4819-80A1-32BE88D9399B.jpeg


And the difference between these 2 lengths is half the wavelength in mm
 
So there you are.
 
Merlin3189 said:
So there you are.

Ok thanks I’m sort of getting it but when I do this

94BC5007-B8A3-4601-A30C-521F31A1C816.jpeg


What do I choose my pipe length, L to be?
 
I must let L be 240.3mm to get a end correction, e to be 0.01165m right?

8BD9F37E-1FBD-47B4-9DD4-2BB81B357493.jpeg
 
Yes. You could have used the longer one, but that would have been 3λ/4 rather than λ/4

So now you can calculate the speed of sound. Perhaps that's why they didn't mention it?

BTW
If this had been a real experiment, they wouldn't have given the same answer of course, because neither would be exactly right. And you wouldn't know which was better. I'd choose the longer one, because the ±1mm or whatever your measurement error is, would make less % error on the longer measurement.

I seriously can't believe anyone could possibly locate these resonances as precisely as they claim.
What any normal person would do, is to, preferably find more resonances and also take several measurements at each one to get an average and an estimate of the random error.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes Bolter
Back
Top