A Operators used without being explained

  • A
  • Thread starter Thread starter Technon
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Operators
Technon
Messages
17
Reaction score
3
I started watching the video lecture series here: https://ocw.mit.edu/courses/physics/8-04-quantum-physics-i-spring-2016/video-lectures/part-1/ I notice that they use the term "operator" without first explaining it. Operators are also not explained (in fact they are not even mentioned) in my course litterature (Physics for Scientists and Engineers, 6th Edition by Paul A. Tipler (Author), Gene Mosca).

Since operators are not explained, it seems one is supposed to understand the subject without knowledge about them? Is it possible?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Technon said:
I started watching the video lecture series here: https://ocw.mit.edu/courses/physics/8-04-quantum-physics-i-spring-2016/video-lectures/part-1/ I notice that they use the term "operator" without first explaining it. Operators are also not explained (in fact they are not even mentioned) in my course litterature (Physics for Scientists and Engineers, 6th Edition by Paul A. Tipler (Author), Gene Mosca).

Since operators are not explained, it seems one is supposed to understand the subject without knowledge about them? Is it possible?
Lecture Notes: first document, first page (after introduction)!
 
So operators are just functions
 
Technon said:
So operators are just functions
Yes, and usually linear functions. That is they apply to vector spaces. One (normally) says operator instead of transformation, if this vector space itself consists of functions, e.g. smooth functions, or continuous functions, or as in QM square integrable functions. E.g. if we consider ##V=C^\infty (\mathbb{R})## the vector space of all smooth functions in one real variable, then ##D=\dfrac{d}{dx}\, : \,f \longmapsto f\,' ## is such a (linear) operator, the differential operator.

Have a read: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/tell-operations-operators-functionals-representations-apart/
 
  • Like
Likes dextercioby
Technon said:
So operators are just functions

fresh_42 said:
Yes, and usually linear functions.

With an appropriate interpretation of the term "functions", yes. An operator on a vector space is a mapping of the vector space into itself, i.e., it maps every vector in the vector space into another vector in the vector space (which might, in some cases, be the same vector).

I say this because operators in QM, which are always linear, are often represented by matrices, and most people don't intuitively thing of matrices and functions as being the same thing.
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA
If we release an electron around a positively charged sphere, the initial state of electron is a linear combination of Hydrogen-like states. According to quantum mechanics, evolution of time would not change this initial state because the potential is time independent. However, classically we expect the electron to collide with the sphere. So, it seems that the quantum and classics predict different behaviours!
Back
Top