Opinion Poll on Bigfoot, Alien, Ghosts

In summary, Ivan believes that ghosts exist but they may not agree on what we mean by ghosts. There is a wide range of alleged phenomena, each of which are generally interpreted as one or another of so called ghosts, but what he really means by his vote is seemingly unexplained phenomena. He does think odd things happen, but he doesn't leap to any particular interpretation of that phenomena as being due to the souls of the dead, evil spirits, transdimensional beings, or any of the many explanations conjured up in the pop culture. On the other hand, some of this stuff is downright spooky.

Opinions please

  • Bigfoot of the Pacific Northwest absolutely does not exist

    Votes: 18 42.9%
  • Bigfoot of the Pacific Northwest may exist, there may be some valid evidence

    Votes: 19 45.2%
  • Bigfoot of the Pacific Northwest absolutely exists, some of the evidence is undeniable

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • Alien life absolutely does not exist

    Votes: 2 4.8%
  • Alien life may exist, but there is no concrete evidence they have visited earth

    Votes: 35 83.3%
  • Alien life absolutely exists, and there is undeniable evidence that they have visited earth

    Votes: 5 11.9%
  • Ghosts absolutely do not exist

    Votes: 18 42.9%
  • Ghosts may exist, some evidence of their existence may be valid

    Votes: 21 50.0%
  • Ghosts absolutely exist, there is undeniable evidence of them

    Votes: 0 0.0%

  • Total voters
    42
  • #1
pierre45
21
0
This is part of a survey I am doing for a class project, wanted to get a sampling from the scientific community. Many Thanks.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
I voted that ghosts may exist but we may not agree on what we mean by ghosts. There is a wide range of alleged phenomena, each of which are generally interpreted as one or another of so called ghosts, but what I really mean by my vote is seemingly unexplained phenomena. I do think odd things happen, but I don't leap to any particular interpretation of that phenomena as being due to the souls of the dead, evil spirits, transdimensional beings, or any of the many explanations conjured up in the pop culture. On the other hand, some of this stuff is downright spooky. :biggrin:
 
Last edited:
  • #3
I voted that bigfoot of the Pacific Northwest absolutely does not exist. The last one of us has finally migrated to San Diego County and we're all called Zoobies now.
 
  • #4
Hi Ivan,
Yes, I'm using "ghosts" as kind of a catch-all phrase for...well...something hard to sum up in a word, but juicier than "unexplained phenomenon". So I think you were right in voting yes.

It's interesting, the two differences between this poll and another I ran elsewhere is only in the Alien category, I've found more true blue believers elsewhere...and in the Bigfoot category, apparently some here are more open to the idea of Bigfoot being possibly real than I've found elsewhere.

I was using these opinion gatherings in helping me to decide what to write a paper on...and ultimately decided on Aliens, what the phenomenom says about our culture. I believe my conclusion will be that I'm not sure what terrifies me more, the idea that Aliens beings are cruising the Earth abducting, poking, and prodding people...or the idea that a few percent of the population are so delusional that they believe that they have been abducted. Either way, for all the play this subject does get in the mainstream press, it deserves much more...because of course, if it is true, what could possibly be more important?
 
  • #5
Within the given context, here but rarely if ever interacting with humans, is another option...whatever they might be, which would be another question entirely were they here. :biggrin:
 
  • #6
pierre45 said:
I believe my conclusion will be that I'm not sure what terrifies me more, the idea that Aliens beings are cruising the Earth abducting, poking, and prodding people...or the idea that a few percent of the population are so delusional that they believe that they have been abducted.
Thing is, the "abductions" are more vivid and realistic than you probably suppose. We talk about it in this thread:

https://www.physicsforums.com/showthread.php?t=108665

You ought to read at least up to my "abduction", and however much of the resultant discussion hold your interest. It should have bearing on your paper.
 
  • #7
zoobyshoe said:
I voted that bigfoot of the Pacific Northwest absolutely does not exist. The last one of us has finally migrated to San Diego County and we're all called Zoobies now.

That surprises me. Was it the alleged debunking of the Patterson film?
 
  • #8
Ivan Seeking said:
That surprises me. Was it the alleged debunking of the Patterson film?
I was joking. I actually voted "may exist".
 
  • #9
Big foot doesn't exist.(excluding zoobyshoe)

Alien life is very likely given the number of galaxies in the universe, but has it visited probably not.

Ghosts exists or at least people see something, what it is or even if they actually do see anythign but a halucination or whatever is currently anyones guess.
 
  • #10
zoobyshoe said:
Thing is, the "abductions" are more vivid and realistic than you probably suppose. We talk about it in this thread:

https://www.physicsforums.com/showthread.php?t=108665

You ought to read at least up to my "abduction", and however much of the resultant discussion hold your interest. It should have bearing on your paper.

Sorry Zoob, didn't mean for that to sound dismissive, they are very vivid and realistic I know. My point is that there are only two possibilities, either they are all delusions of some kind (all of them), or at least some of them (one even) are real. If they are all delusions it is very worrisome, if they aren't then it is truly terrifying. That's all I meant.
 
  • #11
I read your story, I had a dream once that was not similar in it's details but very similar in it's vividness, it was as if it happened. I was sleeping, and my dream so far as I can remember did not have a lead-in to the event (like you walking to Micky D's) so I never would have considered it more than a dream.

(I dreamt) I was with a friend of mine, Adam, out at my summer cabin. I recall distinctly his 55 Chevy parked out near a storage shed, both doors open, us standing outside and to the front of the car looking up. It was night. There was a blue beam of light shining down on me, but it almost existed more as a sound that a light...there was a very intense buzzing low freq noise in my head...it was a little like it had control of my head, I was not necessarily able to think or do anything...the buzz had control. I do remember thinking that "ahhhh...so this is a tractor beam" It was one of the most intense feelings I've ever had, I remember the feeling now 10 years later just as I did when I woke up.

It was very strange all the way around, extremely intense. But I don't count that as a delusion, it was a dream. I'm more interested in the abduction stories that occur when people claim to have been awake. Or people waking up with their clothes on backwards...you know less explicable stuff. They are either bone crazy, or it's happening.
 
  • #12
pierre45 said:
But I don't count that as a delusion, it was a dream. I'm more interested in the abduction stories that occur when people claim to have been awake.
I think we went into this in that thread. Sleep paralysis with accompanying hallucinations followed by false memories edited in after the fact probably account for many. Then I think I mentioned trance states induced by having lights from airplanes catch your eye while you're fatigued from driving.

(It's interesting, I just happened to watch the old Humphrey Bogart film They Drive By Night about long distance truckers, and the whole culture they describe is one of stopping to chug coffee so they didn't fall asleep at the wheel. Despite that, there are two major accidents in the film caused by people falling sound asleep while driving. A girl I know told me the story of going cross country with a guy and waking up from a nap to look over and see her friend at the wheel with his eyes closed, snoring peacefully. My bet is that many people end up driving long distances in some in-between state - eyes open, and partially reactive to the environment, but essentially in a trance. )
Or people waking up with their clothes on backwards...you know less explicable stuff. They are either bone crazy, or it's happening.
If you have the time you might research the phenomenon of Complex-Partial seizures. These are non-convulsive seizures that essentially can throw a person right from full consciousness into a sleepwalking state. Many people perform complex actions during complex partials for which they later have total amnesia. Taking your clothes off and putting them on backwards is completely consistent with the sort of thing they might do. Undressing is common. I read an account by one guy who would take his trousers off, take everything out of the pockets, and arrange all the stuff neatly on a table, then go wandering around with no pants on. In all cases, regardless of the particular thing they do during the seizure, the common thing to all is amnesia for the event after it's over. In other words: missing time.

The trouble with this kind of seizure is that if no one sees them in that state, tell them what they did, and gets them to a doctor, it won't occur to them that the "missing time" represents a neurological problem. I think a lot of abductees are undiagnosed cases of Complex-Partial seizures, which the person embroiders with false memories of abduction, when that's the only thing they've heard of that seems to explain it.
 
  • #13
I voted for, alien life exsts and there is concrete proof. Every night that I look up at a clear sky, it is proof enough. I guess I'm just a little bit too far ahead... it's another "earth is flat" era... and I've already accepted that it's round. The only reason so many people haven't accepted this yet is because of organized religions. Erase that from your mind and you're free to explore your existence and come to accepting truths about the universe.
 
  • #14
dgoodpasture2005 said:
I voted for, alien life exsts and there is concrete proof. Every night that I look up at a clear sky, it is proof enough.
The "proof" part of the question, though, is about them having visited earth, not about the notion of there being life somewhere else.
 
  • #15
A leap of faith or a so called expanded consciousness is not concrete proof; unless of course you have met ET. :biggrin:
 
  • #16
Oh, I understand. I'm being a little careful about that! Last time I mentioned anything about it, I was banned. Trying to be respectful to the site so I can stick around and have conversation with you otherwise nice and intellectual folk. :)
 
  • #17
Actually, "I believe because I've seen one" is absolutely allowed in the S&D forum. In this case it was a poll asking your opinion, but as a rule, "I know it to be true just because", is another thing. As long as we stick with the perceived facts from personal experiences and don't get into theories or extended messages from ET, I would like to hear your story - we are always interested in sincere claims of direct observations of phenomena. Feel free to start a thread.
 
  • #18
The chances of their not being ET life in the universe are extremely small to the point of the notion that their isn't being somewhat absurd, the problem is the sparsity of life and the distances involved. I'm not going to start making any definitive claims that ET life has visited Earth unless I start making mashed potato mountains after seeing lots of alien space craft/aliens.:smile:

Ghosts undoubtedly people have seen or experienced bizarre phenomena, the question is, is it something "real" or material, is it halucination. Is the number of hauntings related to an area indicative of the ambience and general histroy and rumour, real events, or even just fanciful imaginings primed by sugestion. Is their some sort of imprinting on an area when particularly horrific events happen? Answer? Jury is out?

Bigfoot, aw cmon now, it's a plot by the parks commision to get more tourist/government money :wink:
 
Last edited:
  • #19
Ivan flipped his avatar!
 
  • #20
I voted no aliens no ghosts and no big foot.. But I am 100% sure of the loch ness monster :rolleyes:
 
  • #21
The chances of their not being ET life in the universe are extremely small to the point of the notion that their isn't being somewhat absurd, the problem is the sparsity of life and the distances involved.

why is the chance so small? Ok let me rephrase that, from a statiscal view point it could be argued within a closed system that is true. But I believe this is assuming the fluke nature to our exsistance, ie the Earth happened becuase it was probably going to happen. We can't prove this, as fact. Nor can we prove as fact the assumption that We are the reason the Universe is here, as some Shamanic Tribes believe, if we are the reason for this universe there is no reason for there to be statiscally any Aliens..

My 2 cents.. :p
 
  • #22
part of the problem with my poll is there are just too many iterations and subtleties that could have been included...I tried to break things down into what I thought were meaningful categories, basically hardcore skeptic, jury is out, and true believer.

I saw a poll the other day that more people believe Aliens are visiting the Earth than voted for either candidate in the last Nat'l election. I found that quite striking, and came up with some arguments to explain why "we" are so seemingly willing to believe. Most of them focused on religious aspects, both on our societies proven ability to take things on faith (widespread belief in God) and the alien subculture as a new kind of religion for a lot of people. And wondering where the phenomenom is heading, either an Alien unveiling, into the scrapheap with werewolves and vampires, or an actual cemented new age religion with fairly widespread appeal. Or some hybrid. In any case, very interesting subject.
 
  • #23
pierre45 said:
I found that quite striking, and came up with some arguments to explain why "we" are so seemingly willing to believe. Most of them focused on religious aspects, both on our societies proven ability to take things on faith (widespread belief in God) and the alien subculture as a new kind of religion for a lot of people.
People almost have to believe things other people tell them in order to survive in society. It's really not linked to religion at all, but is a habit established by parents. It really takes a tremendous amount of effort for an individual to unhook their ideas about the world from their peers because it means a certain amount of alienation. I was talking to a girl a few months ago who said something like: "What about ghosts, eh? There must be something to that. Just about everybody you know has some kind of ghost story." If someone you know and like says they saw a ghost it can be seen as anti-social to express active doubt.
 
  • #24
I agree with what you're saying if you're putting it in the context of a guy trying to score with a girl, or even any kind of social interaction one on one, its called being polite, but that doesn't mean you actually buy it. And in a situation of a poll, anonymous, 34% said yes I believe Aliens are here. Thats staggering.

I think your logic explains immediate personal relations, but not private thinking, especially with the countervailing self congratulating we all get from detecting BS and identifying someone else as full of it.
 
  • #25
pierre45 said:
I think your logic explains immediate personal relations, but not private thinking, especially with the countervailing self congratulating we all get from detecting BS and identifying someone else as full of it.
People's private thinking can change dramatically when someone they like come up with a story like this. It's often more intolerable to think about such a person having been hallucinating without realizing it, or even having been fooled by anomalous but ordinary things than to be open to paranormal explanations. If most people in your circle of friends believe in something and have a story, it really becomes an act of an anti-social nature to even think of them all as deluded. More comfortable to say "How about ghosts, eh? Seems like everybody has a ghost story. There's got to be something to it." What I sensed in that girls remark was something to the effect of "I'm not going to be so arrogant as to think they're all deluded or lying." because that would mean cutting herself off from them. So, when she takes the poll she say, yes, there probably something to it.
 
  • #26
Bigfoot - not. . . I'd bet on crop circles before going there. Aliens - absolutely, but no visitations. Ghosts - yes, but they reside in my UFO folder. The observational evidence is good, but the explanations are deficient.
 
  • #27
Why so absolute on Bigfoot?
 
  • #28
pierre45 said:
Sorry Zoob, didn't mean for that to sound dismissive, they are very vivid and realistic I know. My point is that there are only two possibilities, either they are all delusions of some kind (all of them), or at least some of them (one even) are real. If they are all delusions it is very worrisome, if they aren't then it is truly terrifying. That's all I meant.
I don't agree with your assertion that there are only two possibilities. In the case of UFO sightings, the more likely explanation is misidentification of prosaic objects. In the case of alien abductions, many of them may be explained by lies.
 
  • #29
Anttech said:
why is the chance so small? Ok let me rephrase that, from a statiscal view point it could be argued within a closed system that is true. But I believe this is assuming the fluke nature to our exsistance, ie the Earth happened becuase it was probably going to happen. We can't prove this, as fact. Nor can we prove as fact the assumption that We are the reason the Universe is here, as some Shamanic Tribes believe, if we are the reason for this universe there is no reason for there to be statiscally any Aliens..

My 2 cents.. :p

I mean no offence but that is a stunningly egocentric observation, or homosapienscentric would be more accurate. Prove we are the "centre" of the universe and I'll deny inevitabiltiy of life elsewhere in it:rolleyes:

Earth is not unique IMO, and atm it is just that, I don't see how a trillion star systems would alow just one Earth. It's fairly unfeasable. Again I'm hypothesising, but it's not a bad hypothesis to supose life is out there elsewhere.

Need to build an interferometry telescope somewhere passed the Earth's atmosphere and soon IMHO.:smile:

SGT said:
I don't agree with your assertion that there are only two possibilities. In the case of UFO sightings, the more likely explanation is misidentification of prosaic objects. In the case of alien abductions, many of them may be explained by lies.

Yeah and what's the best way to cover up the mundane but "top secret"? Get a government agency to say it's all lies and leak "top secret documents" that say the contrary. Nice work Major have a shiny badge for your collar :smile: Sometimes military intelligence is not ah, damn I forgot the word it means a contradiction in terms, you know what I mean.
 
Last edited:
  • #30
Schrodinger's Dog said:
The chances of their not being ET life in the universe are extremely small to the point of the notion that their isn't being somewhat absurd, the problem is the sparsity of life and the distances involved. I'm not going to start making any definitive claims that ET life has visited Earth unless I start making mashed potato mountains after seeing lots of alien space craft/aliens.:smile:
This is only an opinion. It is also my opinion that life should be quite abundant in the Universe. But when we talk about inteligent life and technological civilizations, the problem is entirely diverse. The Drake equation proposes to estimate the number of technological civilizations. It is a very smart proposal, but relies on several unknown parameters. I have seen one choice of parameters that leads to the existence of only one such civilization in the Universe. Since humans constitute a technological society, there should be no other. Of course, choosing different values fo the parameters we can arrive at other numbers.
I stick with my opinion that alien life probably exists, but there is no hard evidence for alien visitations on Earth.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • #31
SGT said:
This is only an opinion. It is also my opinion that life should be quite abundant in the Universe. But when we talk about inteligent life and technological civilizations, the problem is entirely diverse. The Drake equation proposes to estimate the number of technological civilizations. It is a very smart proposal, but relies on several unknown parameters. I have seen one choice of parameters that leads to the existence of only one such civilization in the Universe. Since humans constitute a technological society, there should be no other. Of course, choosing different values fo the parameters we can arrive at other numbers.
I stick with my opinion that alien life probably exists, but there is no hard evidence for alien visitations on Earth.

I see: yeah I agree; thanks for the clarification :smile:
 
  • #32
SGT said:
I don't agree with your assertion that there are only two possibilities. In the case of UFO sightings, the more likely explanation is misidentification of prosaic objects. In the case of alien abductions, many of them may be explained by lies.

delusion: A false belief or opinion.

I think your first example falls squarely under the delusion category, your second example is an assumed possibility, but I was talking specifically about those who THINK they are recounting the truth. Which I think is a high percentage of the cases.
 
  • #33
pierre45 said:
delusion: A false belief or opinion.

I think your first example falls squarely under the delusion category, your second example is an assumed possibility, but I was talking specifically about those who THINK they are recounting the truth. Which I think is a high percentage of the cases.
And how can you distinguish between a delusional witness and a liar?
 
  • #34
You can't but you can at least prove the liar to be so, the person who is delusional, well that's a really hard thing to prove, and therein lies the rub:approve:
 
  • #35
SGT said:
And how can you distinguish between a delusional witness and a liar?

I don't know, and for the purposes of my paper I don't really care whether they are one or the other. What I am interested in is why so many people find it so easy to believe that they are neither.

If someone sees something in the sky that is strange...I have no trouble believing them, that they saw something. If they tell me it was an Alien spaceship, why would I accept that at face value? Why would I think they know what an alien spaceship looks like? Why would I think they would know what the flight pattern of an alien spacecraft would be?

I am trying to understand both A) Why people who see strange things are so willing to attribute it to be Alien in nature, and B) Why people who haven't seen them are so willing to accept that that is in fact what other people have seen?

I can understand believing that they have seen SOMETHING, but why the ready acceptance of the definition?
 

Similar threads

  • Poll
  • General Discussion
Replies
22
Views
956
  • Poll
  • General Discussion
Replies
14
Views
2K
  • Poll
  • General Discussion
3
Replies
90
Views
7K
  • General Discussion
Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
14
Views
453
Replies
20
Views
854
  • General Discussion
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • General Discussion
2
Replies
67
Views
16K
  • General Discussion
2
Replies
40
Views
7K
Replies
26
Views
6K
Back
Top