Opposite Electrical Charge: Particle Attraction

Curt Evans
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
If you have two particles of opposite electrical charge in proximity, what actually sets them in motion? As a an analogy, if you have two balls in either end of a tube and remove the air between them, outside pressure will push them together. What is the equivalent process at the particle level?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The particles exert an attractive electrical force on each other, resulting in an acceleration of each particle towards the other. In your example, the air molecules exerts a repulsive force on the balls when they collide with them, which pushes them together.

See here: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Coulomb's_law
 
Curt Evans said:
If you have two particles of opposite electrical charge in proximity, what actually sets them in motion? As a an analogy, if you have two balls in either end of a tube and remove the air between them, outside pressure will push them together.
That is not an analogy, but an example of the very same force. The electrons in the air atoms and the ball atoms are repelling each other.
 
Drakkith said:
The particles exert an attractive electrical force on each other, resulting in an acceleration of each particle towards the other. In your example, the air molecules exerts a repulsive force on the balls when they collide with them, which pushes them together.

See here: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Coulomb's_law

The question is why do they accelerate. The provided some information on virtual particle exchange, that's what I'm trying to get my head around.
 
Curt Evans said:
The question is why do they accelerate. The provided some information on virtual particle exchange, that's what I'm trying to get my head around.

Don't even try to wrap your head around virtual particle exchange. It's so far beyond your current level of physics that you have no hope of understanding it. Stick with the classical understanding for now. Not to mention that it really doesn't explain why particles accelerate any more than classical physics does, it only elaborates on how the interaction between two particles works and enables us to make more accurate predictions at the atomic and subatomic level.

In the end the two particles accelerate because they feel a force from each other. Applying a force to an object causes it to accelerate. It's literally as simple as that, and trying to find a "deeper" understanding is pointless. You won't find one because it doesn't exist, and not even understanding virtual particles will change this.
 
Thread 'Why is there such a difference between the total cross-section data? (simulation vs. experiment)'
Well, I'm simulating a neutron-proton scattering phase shift. The equation that I solve numerically is the Phase function method and is $$ \frac{d}{dr}[\delta_{i+1}] = \frac{2\mu}{\hbar^2}\frac{V(r)}{k^2}\sin(kr + \delta_i)$$ ##\delta_i## is the phase shift for triplet and singlet state, ##\mu## is the reduced mass for neutron-proton, ##k=\sqrt{2\mu E_{cm}/\hbar^2}## is the wave number and ##V(r)## is the potential of interaction like Yukawa, Wood-Saxon, Square well potential, etc. I first...
Toponium is a hadron which is the bound state of a valance top quark and a valance antitop quark. Oversimplified presentations often state that top quarks don't form hadrons, because they decay to bottom quarks extremely rapidly after they are created, leaving no time to form a hadron. And, the vast majority of the time, this is true. But, the lifetime of a top quark is only an average lifetime. Sometimes it decays faster and sometimes it decays slower. In the highly improbable case that...
I'm following this paper by Kitaev on SL(2,R) representations and I'm having a problem in the normalization of the continuous eigenfunctions (eqs. (67)-(70)), which satisfy \langle f_s | f_{s'} \rangle = \int_{0}^{1} \frac{2}{(1-u)^2} f_s(u)^* f_{s'}(u) \, du. \tag{67} The singular contribution of the integral arises at the endpoint u=1 of the integral, and in the limit u \to 1, the function f_s(u) takes on the form f_s(u) \approx a_s (1-u)^{1/2 + i s} + a_s^* (1-u)^{1/2 - i s}. \tag{70}...
Back
Top