Optics: How much light required to heat water?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around a homework problem calculating how much water can be heated by a mole of photons with a wavelength of 510 nm. The calculations show that 49,693 grams of water could be heated by 1.13 °C, but this answer is deemed incorrect due to formatting requirements for significant figures. Participants suggest that the online homework system may require the answer to be presented in three significant figures without scientific notation. There is a consensus that the treatment of zeros in significant figures can be ambiguous, leading to confusion in the expected answer format. The conversation highlights the importance of clarity in significant figure rules in scientific calculations.
Feodalherren
Messages
604
Reaction score
6

Homework Statement


How many grams of water could have its temperature raised by 1.13 °C by a mole of photons that have a wavelength of 510 nm?


Homework Equations



E=hf

λf=c

The Attempt at a Solution



(3x10^8) / (510 x 10^-9) = 5.88 x 10^14 Hz

multiply by Planck's constant to get E= 3.8977x10^-19 J/photon.

Now multiply by avogadro's number to get 234719J

234,719J = m (4.18J/g C)(1.13 C)

m = 49693g

supposedly not the correct answer. I don't know the correct answer but the input thing for online homework tells me it wants 3 significant figures in grams and since you can't enter any powers of ten the answer must be less than a kg.
Any ideas?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Your work looks correct to me.

It could be that they want you to round to three significant figures without using scientific notation (powers of 10). Zeros on the right end of the number would be assumed non-significant.
 
  • Like
Likes 1 person
Hah! You were right. That just doesn't seem like the correct way to do it to me though.

Thank you.
 
Good. I agree with you. Zeros on the right of an integer are generally ambiguous in regard to being significant figures.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...

Similar threads

Replies
17
Views
5K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
1K
Back
Top