Optics Newton’s ring apparatus Problem

  • Thread starter Thread starter roam
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Optics Ring
AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around the confusion between using "m-1/2" and "m+1/2" in the formula for the radius of bright rings in a Newton's ring apparatus. The problem involves two wavelengths, with the 11th bright ring of one wavelength coinciding with the 10th ring of another, leading to a calculated second wavelength of 603.5 nm. Participants debate whether the counting of rings starts at zero or one, which affects the formula used. There is also a question about how to apply the formulas for minima versus maxima in this context. Clarification on the definitions of m and the conditions for maxima and minima is sought to resolve the discrepancies.
roam
Messages
1,265
Reaction score
12

Homework Statement



Here is a worked problem:

A Newton’s ring apparatus is illuminated by light with two wavelength components. One of
these wavelengths is 546 nm. If the 11th bright ring of the 546 nm fringe coincides with the
10th ring of the other wavelength, what is the second wavelength? The spherical surface
has a radius of 1 m.

Solution:

Radius of mth bright ring is:

##x = ((m-\frac{1}{2})\lambda R)^{1/2}##

So

##(10.5 \times 546 \times 10^{-9} \times 1)^{1/2} = (9.5 \times \lambda \times 1)^{1/2}##

##\lambda = 603.5 \ nm##

I don't see why they've used "m-1/2" instead of "m+1/2"?

Homework Equations



According to my textbook the radius of mth bright fringe is:

##x = ((m+\frac{1}{2})\lambda R)^{1/2}##

Where R is the radius of curvature of the convex lens.

The Attempt at a Solution



My textbook always uses "m+1/2" whereas my lecture notes always use "m-1/2". I'm confused because id I use the first one I get an entirely different answer.

I would appreciate it if anyone could explain why we need to use the minus for this particular problem, and not the plus.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Could there be a difference in how m is defined like is the very first ring m=0 or is it m=1

that is do they start counting at ZERO or at ONE?
 
  • Like
Likes 1 person
Thank you. I think if we start counting at ##m=0##, we should use ##m+\frac{1}{2}##. And if we count from ##m=1## then we should use ##m- \frac{1}{2}##.

BUT what if the problem asked for minima, instead of maxima?

I mean, the condition for minima is ##m \lambda##. Here do we count from m=0, or from m=1?? :confused:
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top