Optics/ total internal reflection (non-trivial at least for me)

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around calculating the refractive index gradient in the Earth's atmosphere to enable a light ray emitted horizontally to circle the Earth. Participants express uncertainty about achieving total internal reflection due to the gradual change in refractive index, suggesting that a drastic change is necessary for such reflection to occur. There is a consensus that the curvature of the light ray must match the Earth's curvature, but the method to quantify this relationship remains unclear. Some contributors suggest simplifying assumptions about refractive indices, while others question the feasibility of total internal reflection in this context. The problem is recognized as complex, with participants seeking further insights and assistance.
ed1234
Messages
2
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


The refractive index of the Earth's atmosphere is:
n=1.01+(alpha)(R-r)
where (alpha) is a constant, r is radial distance from Earth's centre and R is the Earth's radius. By considering a path comprising a series of total internal reflections or otherwise, find a value of alpha for which a light ray emitted horizontally close to the Earth's surface would go around the Earth.

The Earth may be taken to be a perfect sphere radius R and the effects of absorption ignored).

Homework Equations


n1sin(theta1)=n2sin(theta2)

The Attempt at a Solution


I'm really fairly stuck on this on. I think we're looking for a gradient of refractive index such that the curvature of the light ray is equal to the curvature of the Earth but I'm not sure how to go about doing this quantitativly. Any hints/help would be appreciated.
Thanks
 
Physics news on Phys.org
A very simplistic approach, but at least it gives you something.

I guess you take n1 at r = R.
 

Attachments

  • around earth.gif
    around earth.gif
    12.5 KB · Views: 565
Last edited:
Thanks for your suggestion, but since there's no single boundary (n changes gradually) I'm not sure that your picture is quite what the question wants.

If anyones got any further help I'd appreciate it.
Thanks
 
With a gradual change in refractive index I doubt that a state of total internal reflection would occur, but I might be proven wrong. My take on the situation is that one needs a drastic change in refractive index to achieve total internal reflection. Unless the problem uses the term but actually means that the beam just keeps on gradually curling around the earth, which I find hard to believe, since you generally find such behaviour only in the vicinity of black holes!

A more realistic approach for the refractive indices in my drawing might be to take n1 at r and n2 = 1.0 (vacuum).

I am amazed that the astonomy people have'nt jumped onto this thread by now.

It seems you are trying to solve a quite advance problem http://www.journals.uchicago.edu/AJ/journal/issues/v119n5/200020/200020.html"
 
Last edited by a moderator:
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top