Optimization with schedule constraints

aydos
Messages
19
Reaction score
2
Hi, I have a optimization problem and I need to find a way to solve it even if only with an approximate solution.

Let's suppose we have a finite set of vertical containers each with a distinct liquid chemical inside.(say a handful of vertical pipes). At the top, these containers have an inflow of chemical all at different and varying flow rates. We have sensors to measure the height of the chemical inside each container. At the bottom, they all connect into a single common point with a switching outflow valve that allows the discharge of only one container at any point in time.

The optimization comprises the minimization of the cumulative sum of all chemical heights, via the optimal switching times of the outflow valve. Switching has a cost of no flow for X seconds.

This seems rather like a common production scheduling problem where one needs to work out the sequence and switching times of the valve in real time based on sensor readings. But there is one additional constraint:

- there is a set of future time windows (schedule) during which a particular chemical must be flowing out. The schedule is sparse, say about 90% of the time there is nothing scheduled.

One obvious approximation is to approximate the optimal solution by optimizing without the schedule constraints and simply switch to the scheduled chemical when the time comes and hope for the best. This is however, not enough. I suspect there must be more optimal solutions out there.

Any ideas or pointers of where I could find solutions to similar problems?
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
aydos said:
The optimization comprises the minimization of the cumulative sum of all chemical heights, via the optimal switching times of the outflow valve

Won't this sum vary with time? How do you decide if one sum-vs-time is "smaller" than another sum-vs-time?
 
Good question, yes it varies with time. We need to make real-time decisions that will optimally minimize the sum from t_0 to t_Inf. However, I would be happy with solving from t_0 to t_N where N is a receding horizon.

Also I just realized that we are trying to minimize the sum of squares of the heights not simply the sum of heights. Sorry for the oversight.
 
aydos said:
We need to make real-time decisions that will optimally minimize the sum from t_0 to t_Inf..

It isn't clear what that means. Are you talking about an integration with respect to time?
 
Yes.
 
There is a branch of applied mathematics called "optimal control" that includes situations where a process is controlled by using continuous functions to manipulate the inputs. I don't understand the specifics of you problem well enough to match it to any textbook optimal control problem.
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagorus'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...
Back
Top