Optimizing Exposure Time for Different Magnitude Stars

  • Thread starter Thread starter learningastronomy
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Noise Ratio Signal
AI Thread Summary
An image of a 6th magnitude star with a 60-second exposure yielded a signal-to-noise ratio (S/N) of 20. To achieve an S/N of 100, the required exposure time was calculated to be 1500 seconds. The discussion also addressed how to calculate S/N for a 2nd magnitude star with a 10-second exposure, noting that the count rate would differ due to the change in magnitude. The participants emphasized the importance of considering Poisson noise and the correct application of magnitude differences in calculations. The conversation highlighted the need for clarity on how to incorporate magnitude into the S/N ratio formula.
learningastronomy
Messages
15
Reaction score
3
Summary:: An image was taken with a ##60## second exposure time of a 6th magnitude star and the signal to noise ratio was detected to be ##S/N = 20##.

a. What should the exposure time be if you wanted a ##S/N = 100##?
b. Now calculate the ##S/N## if it were a 2nd magnitude star for a ##10## second exposure.

For part a I got the following:

Let ##S = \mu t##, where ##\mu## is the count and ##t## is time, therefore we have $$S/N = 20$$ $$\frac{\mu t}{\sqrt(\mu t)} = 20$$ $$(\frac{\mu t}{\sqrt(\mu t)})^2= 20^2$$ $$\frac{\mu^2 t^2}{\mu t} = 400$$ therefore the count ##\mu## is ##400##. Therefore in order to get ##S/N = 100## we have $$S/N = 100$$ $$\frac{\mu t}{\sqrt(\mu t)} = 100$$ $$(\frac{400t}{\sqrt(400t)})^2= 100^2$$ $$\frac{400^2 t^2}{400t} = 10000$$ now solving for ##t## I got ##1500## seconds.

But for part b of the question, do I apply the same logic even though the magnitude of the star is different? Or will the logic be different?
 
  • Like
Likes Delta2
Physics news on Phys.org
The count rate ##\mu## will be different and you can calculate how much it will differ based on the magnitude.

You only consider Poisson noise here - which might be fine (and might be expected within the scope of the problem), but in general there can be other noise sources, too.
 
mfb said:
The count rate ##\mu## will be different and you can calculate how much it will differ based on the magnitude.

You only consider Poisson noise here - which might be fine (and might be expected within the scope of the problem), but in general there can be other noise sources, too.

Yes, the scope is only Poisson. So the count rate for part b will be different due to the change of magnitude? So since the magnitude difference is ##4## will I get the following: $$2.5^4 * \sqrt\frac{400}{\frac{60sec}{10sec}}?$$
 
Why did you put the magnitude difference outside the brackets?
 
mfb said:
Why did you put the magnitude difference outside the brackets?
Hmm which brackets?
 
Eh, I meant the square root.
 
mfb said:
Eh, I meant the square root.

I thought the equation was magnitude times the count? Or does the magnitude need to be inside the square root?
 
2.54 is the ratio of photons per time. Just like all the other terms that scale with the signal it should be in the square root if you calculate signal to noise ratios.
 
  • Like
Likes learningastronomy
Back
Top