Optimizing Illumination: Finding the Minimum Point Between Two Light Sources

  • Thread starter Thread starter Feodalherren
  • Start date Start date
Feodalherren
Messages
604
Reaction score
6

Homework Statement


The illumination of an object is directly proportional to to the strength of the source and inversely proportional to the distance squared. If two light sources, one three times stronger than the other, are placed 10 ft apart, where should and object be places on the line between the sources so as to receive the least illumination?

Homework Equations



-----

The Attempt at a Solution



I = s / d^2

[S/d^2] + [3S/(10-d) ^2] = I <-- minimize

I'm completely stuck here. Am I treating d as a constant and just doing d/dS or what?

Sorry that's confusing. I should call distance X instead. Am I taking the derivative with respect to distance was what I meant to ask.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Feodalherren said:

Homework Statement


The illumination of an object is directly proportional to to the strength of the source and inversely proportional to the distance squared. If two light sources, one three times stronger than the other, are placed 10 ft apart, where should and object be places on the line between the sources so as to receive the least illumination?

Homework Equations



-----

The Attempt at a Solution



I = s / d^2

[S/d^2] + [3S/(10-d) ^2] = I <-- minimize

I'm completely stuck here. Am I treating d as a constant and just doing d/dS or what?

Sorry that's confusing. I should call distance X instead. Am I taking the derivative with respect to distance was what I meant to ask.

Yes, it would be better to call the distance from one source ##x## and the other ##10-x## to not confuse it with the ##d## in derivatives. So you have ##I## as a function of ##x##. You have left out the constant of proportionality, which shouldn't matter anyway. So use calculus to find what value of ##x## gives the minimum value of ##I(x)##.
 
Last edited:
There are two things I don't understand about this problem. First, when finding the nth root of a number, there should in theory be n solutions. However, the formula produces n+1 roots. Here is how. The first root is simply ##\left(r\right)^{\left(\frac{1}{n}\right)}##. Then you multiply this first root by n additional expressions given by the formula, as you go through k=0,1,...n-1. So you end up with n+1 roots, which cannot be correct. Let me illustrate what I mean. For this...
Back
Top