Optimizing Motion: Calculating Time for Frictional Motion Between Two Blocks

  • Thread starter Thread starter psingh
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Friction
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on calculating the time required for two blocks to move together without the top block sliding off, given coefficients of static and kinetic friction. The static friction coefficient is 0.60, while the kinetic friction coefficient between the lower block and the floor is 0.20. Participants emphasize that both blocks share the same acceleration while moving together, and they derive equations for net forces acting on each block. The correct acceleration is calculated to be 3.3 m/s², leading to a time of 1.7 seconds to cover a distance of 5.0 m. The importance of accurately identifying mass and drawing free-body diagrams is highlighted for clarity in solving the problem.
psingh
Messages
18
Reaction score
0
The coefficient of static friction is 0.60 between the two blocks in figure. The coefficient of kinetic friction between the lower block and the floor is 0.20. Force causes both blocks to cross a distance of 5.0 m, starting from rest.
What is the least amount of time in which this motion can be completed without the top block sliding on the lower block?

this is wht i think as long at the two blocks are moving together they have the same accleration.

bottom box:
x: Ff= ukFn= 0.20*7kg*9.81m/s/s=7*a

top box:
x: Ft-ff= Ft- usFn= 0.60*4*9.81m/s/s=4*a

and then can't you just use the kinematics equation xf=xi+vt+.5at^2
to find the time?
 

Attachments

  • fizzix.jpg
    fizzix.jpg
    5.1 KB · Views: 1,673
Physics news on Phys.org
Hmm--I prefer to keep the static friction coefficients as \mu _{S,1} and \mu _{S,2} until the end, where
\left\{ \begin{gathered}<br /> \mu _{S,1} = 0.60 \hfill \\<br /> \mu _{S,2} = 0.20 \hfill \\ <br /> \end{gathered} \right\}
and F_{net,1} is the net force for the top block, F_{net,2} is the net force for the bottom block. Here's my solution:
\left\{ \begin{gathered}<br /> F_{net,1} = a \cdot 4.0kg = F_T - 39N\mu _{S,1} \hfill \\<br /> F_{net,2} = a \cdot 3.0kg = 39N\mu _{S,1} - 69N\mu _{S,2} \hfill \\ <br /> \end{gathered} \right\} \Rightarrow
a = \frac{{F_T - 39N\mu _{S,1} }}{{4.0kg}} \Rightarrow

3.0kg\frac{{F_T - 39N\mu _{S,1} }}{{4.0kg}} = 39N\mu _{S,1} - 69N\mu _{S,2} \Rightarrow
\frac{{3.0}}{{4.0}}\left( {F_T - 23N} \right) = 9.6N \Rightarrow F_T = 36N
\therefore a = \frac{{36N - 23N}}{{4.0kg}} = 3.3\frac{m}{{s^2 }}

*Because v_0 = 0 \frac{m}{s}, and I like to set x_0 = 0 m,
\therefore v = \left( {3.3\frac{m}{{s^2 }}} \right)t \Rightarrow x = 5.0m = \left( {3.3\frac{m}{{s^2 }}} \right)\frac{{t^2 }}{2} \Rightarrow t = 1.7s

Is this the correct answer?
 
Last edited:
thanks! ooo i see where i messsed up. on the bottom box for the mass, i made it 7 instead of just 3kg.

thanks alot!
 
psingh said:
thanks! ooo i see where i messsed up. on the bottom box for the mass, i made it 7 instead of just 3kg.

thanks alot!

No problem, welcome to PF:smile:
Drawing the free-body diagrams can help tho*

-When you draw it for the bottom mass,
you can draw two weight vectors, and one large normal force opposing
the stacked masses that relates to the friction of the bottom block against the floor...the second mass has its own free-body diagram/properties, its own 3.0kg, unique to the system (rather than just combining into 7.0kg)
 
Last edited:
The easy way to solve for the acceleration is to just consider forces on the bottom block. No matter how hard the rope is pulled, the only force transmitted to the bottom block is that from the static friction between the blocks. Once that force reaches its maximum value (\mu_2 m_2 g) the bottom block will have the maximum acceleration. You can compute the net force on the bottom block (F_{net} = \mu_2 m_2 g - \mu_1 (m_1 + m_2) g) and thus calculate that maximum acceleration. The rest is kinematics.
 
Hmm--I guess I need a better book than Barron's Review! (I never took Physics C, I'm studying from a review book)-->your method is much faster, I agree'''
(So far I took CalcII in school, and have a bunch of Phys B knowledge w/o the math-->so I figured a review book would be faster, though not necessarily better than a real textbook!)
 
Thread 'Variable mass system : water sprayed into a moving container'
Starting with the mass considerations #m(t)# is mass of water #M_{c}# mass of container and #M(t)# mass of total system $$M(t) = M_{C} + m(t)$$ $$\Rightarrow \frac{dM(t)}{dt} = \frac{dm(t)}{dt}$$ $$P_i = Mv + u \, dm$$ $$P_f = (M + dm)(v + dv)$$ $$\Delta P = M \, dv + (v - u) \, dm$$ $$F = \frac{dP}{dt} = M \frac{dv}{dt} + (v - u) \frac{dm}{dt}$$ $$F = u \frac{dm}{dt} = \rho A u^2$$ from conservation of momentum , the cannon recoils with the same force which it applies. $$\quad \frac{dm}{dt}...
Back
Top