Optimizing Refrigerator Efficiency: Solving for Necessary Power Draw

AI Thread Summary
To optimize refrigerator efficiency, the average heat leak of 300W requires a power draw from the wall calculated using the coefficient of performance (COP). With a typical operating temperature range of 298 K to 250 K, the maximum COP is determined to be 5.2. Using the formula W = Q/COP, the necessary power draw is approximately 57.69W. The discussion emphasizes the benefits of maintaining algebraic expressions until the final calculation for improved accuracy. This approach leads to a more precise result of 57.6W.
patrickmoloney
Messages
94
Reaction score
4

Homework Statement


Suppose that heat leaks into your kitchen refrigerator at an average rate of 300W. Assuming ideal operation, how much power must it draw from the wall.

Homework Equations


\eta = \dfrac{T_C}{T_H - T_C}

W= \dfrac{Q}{COP}

The Attempt at a Solution



A typical refrigerator works between 298 \, K 250 \, K. The maximum possible coefficient of performance is

COP = \dfrac{250}{298-250}=5.2

W = \dfrac{Q}{COP}= \dfrac{300 \, W}{5.2} = 57.69 \, W
 
Physics news on Phys.org
patrickmoloney said:

Homework Statement


Suppose that heat leaks into your kitchen refrigerator at an average rate of 300W. Assuming ideal operation, how much power must it draw from the wall.

Homework Equations


\eta = \dfrac{T_C}{T_H - T_C}

W= \dfrac{Q}{COP}

The Attempt at a Solution



A typical refrigerator works between 298 \, K 250 \, K. The maximum possible coefficient of performance is

COP = \dfrac{250}{298-250}=5.2

W = \dfrac{Q}{COP}= \dfrac{300 \, W}{5.2} = 57.69 \, W
Looks right.
The are many benefits in working algebraically, only plugging in numbers right at the end. One is improved accuracy. In the present case you would have got 57.6W exactly.
 
Yeah I think I'll do it algebraically so until the final line. Thanks very much.
 
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...

Similar threads

Back
Top